On 11/04/2008, Andreas Klöckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Freitag 11 April 2008, Robert Kern wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Charles R Harris
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Turns out it matches the matlab definition. Maybe we just need another
> > > function: vande
On Freitag 11 April 2008, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Charles R Harris
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Turns out it matches the matlab definition. Maybe we just need another
> > function: vandermonde
>
> -1 It's needless duplication.
Agree. Let's just live with Matlab
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Charles R Harris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Turns out it matches the matlab definition. Maybe we just need another
> function: vandermonde
-1 It's needless duplication.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
enig
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 09/04/2008, Andreas Klöckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 26 März 2008, Charles R Harris wrote:
> > > The docstring is incorrect. The Vandermonde matrix produced is
> compatible
> > > with numpy po
Hi Chuck, all,
On Mittwoch 09 April 2008, Charles R Harris wrote:
> It would affect polyfit, where the powers correspond to the numpy
> polynomial coefficients. That can be fixed, and as far as I can determine
> that is the only numpy function that uses vander, but it might break some
> software o
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Charles R Harris wrote:
> It would affect polyfit, where the powers correspond to
> the numpy polynomial coefficients. That can be fixed, and
> as far as I can determine that is the only numpy function
> that uses vander, but it might break some software out
> there in the w
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 09/04/2008, Andreas Klöckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 26 März 2008, Charles R Harris wrote:
> > > The docstring is incorrect. The Vandermonde matrix produced is
> compatible
> > > with numpy po
On 09/04/2008, Andreas Klöckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mittwoch 26 März 2008, Charles R Harris wrote:
> > The docstring is incorrect. The Vandermonde matrix produced is compatible
> > with numpy polynomials that also go from high to low powers. I would have
> > done it the other way rou
On Mittwoch 26 März 2008, Charles R Harris wrote:
> The docstring is incorrect. The Vandermonde matrix produced is compatible
> with numpy polynomials that also go from high to low powers. I would have
> done it the other way round, so index matched power, but that isn't how it
> is.
Patch attache
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Andreas Klöckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The docstring for vander() seems to contradict what the function does. In
> particular, the columns in the vander() output seem reversed wrt its
> docstring. I feel like one of the two needs to be fixed, or
Hi all,
The docstring for vander() seems to contradict what the function does. In
particular, the columns in the vander() output seem reversed wrt its
docstring. I feel like one of the two needs to be fixed, or is there
something I'm not seeing?
This here is fresh from the Numpy examples page:
11 matches
Mail list logo
