Re: [Numpy-discussion] umath.maximum.reduce

2007-05-15 Thread Pierre GM
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 17:34:15 Charles R Harris wrote: > I see no one answered ;) I think it is traditional behaviour from Numeric, > so can't be changed without a bit of thought. > Why not file a ticket for the > 1.1 release and see how folks respond? I'll try to. > Is there any reason why

Re: [Numpy-discussion] umath.maximum.reduce

2007-05-15 Thread Charles R Harris
On 5/8/07, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All, On a 2D array, numpy.core.umath.maximum.reduce returns a 1D array (the default axis is 0). An axis=None is not recognized as a valid argument for numpy.core.umath.maximum, unfortunately... Is this the wanted behavior ? Thanks a lot in advance

[Numpy-discussion] umath.maximum.reduce

2007-05-08 Thread Pierre GM
All, On a 2D array, numpy.core.umath.maximum.reduce returns a 1D array (the default axis is 0). An axis=None is not recognized as a valid argument for numpy.core.umath.maximum, unfortunately... Is this the wanted behavior ? Thanks a lot in advance P. _