On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> That indeed looks much more useful than the nose version. I searched a
> bit on the ipython-devel list but couldn't find too much discussion
> about the implementation. Would it be at all possible to let it not
> stop after the first failure? E
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just came across tests for allclose that were using generators and
>> were in a subclass of unittest.TestCase. These tests won't run, nose
>> does not support
Hey,
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just came across tests for allclose that were using generators and
> were in a subclass of unittest.TestCase. These tests won't run, nose
> does not support this (see last line of
> http://somethingaboutorange.com/mrl/projec
Hi all,
I just came across tests for allclose that were using generators and
were in a subclass of unittest.TestCase. These tests won't run, nose
does not support this (see last line of
http://somethingaboutorange.com/mrl/projects/nose/1.0.0/writing_tests.html).
So if you write tests with "yield",
