On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
> Yes that is clear. Would it make sense to first release scipy 0.7.2 though?
> Then numpy 1.4.1 can be tested against it and we can be sure it works. The
> other way around it's not possible to test.
Yes it is, you just have to build scipy
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 2:33 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
> Sorry, I should have been clearer in the above quoted list. There were
> two issues with numpy 1.4.0, one caused by datetime, and one caused by
> other changes to growing structures. The second one is ok for most
> cases, but cython < 0.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> So here is how I see things in the near future for release:
> - compile a simple binary installer for mac os x and windows (no need
> for doc or multiple archs) from 1.4.x
> - test this with the scipy binary out there (running the full
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 8:17 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 2:44 AM, wrote:
>
> >
> > I think I mixed up some things then,
> > scipy 0.7.1 cython files should be regenerated with the latest cython
> > release so that it doesn't check the sizeof anymore.
> > Then, a scipy 0
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 2:44 AM, wrote:
>
> I think I mixed up some things then,
> scipy 0.7.1 cython files should be regenerated with the latest cython
> release so that it doesn't check the sizeof anymore.
> Then, a scipy 0.7.1 build against numpy 1.3 would also work without
> recompiling agai
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Charles R Harris <
charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:53 AM, wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:44 AM, wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:53 AM, wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:44 AM, wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Charles R Harris
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Pauli Virt
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:44 AM, wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>> >>
>> >> pe, 2010-02-26 kello 12:26 -0500, josef.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:44 AM, wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> >>
> >> pe, 2010-02-26 kello 12:26 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com kirjoitti:
> >> [clip]
> >> > recompiling wouldn't be enoug
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>>
>> pe, 2010-02-26 kello 12:26 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com kirjoitti:
>> [clip]
>> > recompiling wouldn't be enough, the cython c files also need to be
>> > regenerated for a
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> pe, 2010-02-26 kello 12:26 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com kirjoitti:
> [clip]
> > recompiling wouldn't be enough, the cython c files also need to be
> > regenerated for a different numpy version.
> > (If I understand the problem correctly.)
>
pe, 2010-02-26 kello 12:26 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com kirjoitti:
[clip]
> recompiling wouldn't be enough, the cython c files also need to be
> regenerated for a different numpy version.
> (If I understand the problem correctly.)
No. The Cython-generated sources just use sizeof(PyArray_Descr), the
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> pe, 2010-02-26 kello 12:09 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com kirjoitti:
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Ralf Gommers
> [clip]
>> > ValueError: numpy.dtype does not appear to be the correct type object
>>
>> This looks like the cython type ch
pe, 2010-02-26 kello 12:09 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com kirjoitti:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Ralf Gommers
[clip]
> > ValueError: numpy.dtype does not appear to be the correct type object
>
> This looks like the cython type check problem, ckdtree.c doesn't look
> compatible with your nump
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I built an installer for OS X and did some testing on a clean computer. All
> NumPy tests pass. SciPy (0.7.1 binary) gives a number of errors and
> failures, I copied one of each type below. For full output see
> http://pastebin.com/e
Hi,
I built an installer for OS X and did some testing on a clean computer. All
NumPy tests pass. SciPy (0.7.1 binary) gives a number of errors and
failures, I copied one of each type below. For full output see
http://pastebin.com/eEcwkzKr . To me it looks like the failures are
harmless, and the k
16 matches
Mail list logo
