Re: [Numpy-discussion] test failures when embedded (in matlab)

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Robin wrote: > Hi All, > > When using Numpy from an embedded Python (Python embedded in a Matlab > mex function) I get a lot of test failures (see attached log). > > I am using CentOS 6.3, distribution packaged Python (2.6) and Numpy > (1.4.1). Running numpy tests f

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures on Windows XP 64-bit

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > Hi, > > I've created a Windows installer of the maintenance/1.7.x branch > (commit f93774d), the binary is available here (created in Wine on > linux): > > > https://github.com/certik/numpy-vendor/blob/69555c40dff5ae9f2d27d827f283bc6d9c53fccf

[Numpy-discussion] Test failures on Windows XP 64-bit

Hi, I've created a Windows installer of the maintenance/1.7.x branch (commit f93774d), the binary is available here (created in Wine on linux): https://github.com/certik/numpy-vendor/blob/69555c40dff5ae9f2d27d827f283bc6d9c53fccf/test/ and when I install it on the Windows XP 64-bit machine, here

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures - which dependencies am I missing?

Chris Ball gmail.com> writes: > > Keith Hughitt gmail.com> writes: > > > Hi Chris, > > > > Try "sudo apt-get build-dep python-numpy" to install the dependencies for > > building NumPy. I believe it will install all of the optional dependencies > > as well. > > Thanks for that, but I'd alrea

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures - which dependencies am I missing?

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Keith Hughitt gmail.com> writes: > > > Hi Chris, > > > > Try "sudo apt-get build-dep python-numpy" to install the dependencies for > > building NumPy. I believe it will install all of the optional > dependencies > > as well. > > Thanks for that

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures - which dependencies am I missing?

Keith Hughitt gmail.com> writes: > Hi Chris, > > Try "sudo apt-get build-dep python-numpy" to install the dependencies for > building NumPy. I believe it will install all of the optional dependencies > as well. Thanks for that, but I'd already tried it and found the same failures. However, I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures - which dependencies am I missing?

Hi Chris, Try "sudo apt-get build-dep python-numpy" to install the dependencies for building NumPy. I believe it will install all of the optional dependencies as well. HTH, Keith ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.s

[Numpy-discussion] Test failures - which dependencies am I missing?

Hi, When I build NumPy and then run the tests on Ubuntu (10.04 LTS) and Debian (6.1), I always seem to get several failures. I guess most of these failures come from not having some dependencies installed, but I can't figure out which ones by reading e.g. http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/user/in

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures on 2.6

On Oct 5, 2008, at 10:53 PM, T J wrote: > Hi, > > I'm getting a couple of test failures with Python 2.6, Numpy 1.2.0, Nose > 0.10.4: Wow, 1.2.0 ? That's fairly ancient. I gather the bugs in numpy.ma have been corrected since (they don't really look familiar, though). And with a more recent n

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures on 2.6

I'm having almost exactly the same problem, but with Python 2.6.1, Numpy 1.2.1, and Nose 0.11.3. Nobody responded to TJ the first time around, so any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Brad -- From: T J gmail.com> Subj

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures r7300

David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 10:33 PM, wrote: >> David Cournapeau wrote: >>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:38 PM, wrote: Hi, I got 16 test failures after building r7300 from svn on debian/sid/i386. Seems all related to complex linear algebra modules. >>> Are you

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures r7300

On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 10:33 PM, wrote: > David Cournapeau wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:38 PM, wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I got 16 test failures after building r7300 from svn on debian/sid/i386. >>> Seems all related to complex linear algebra modules. >> >> Are you using atlas ? (numpy.show_con

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures r7300

David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:38 PM, wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I got 16 test failures after building r7300 from svn on debian/sid/i386. >> Seems all related to complex linear algebra modules. > > Are you using atlas ? (numpy.show_config() output) Yes, it's libatlas-sse2 3.6.0-24 d

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures r7300

On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:38 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > I got 16 test failures after building r7300 from svn on debian/sid/i386. > Seems all related to complex linear algebra modules. Are you using atlas ? (numpy.show_config() output) If so, did you compile it by yourself ? Did you compile everything w

[Numpy-discussion] Test failures r7300

Hi, I got 16 test failures after building r7300 from svn on debian/sid/i386. Seems all related to complex linear algebra modules. Here's the error messages: Running unit tests for numpy NumPy version 1.4.0.dev7300 NumPy is installed in /var/opt/py/lib/python2.5/site-packages/numpy Python version

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures for rev7299

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:51 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > Christopher Hanley wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I receive the following test errors after building numpy rev7229 from svn: >> > > Yep, a bug slipped in the last commit, I am fixing it right now, Hm, the fix does not look so obvious, so I just rever

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures for rev7299

Christopher Hanley wrote: > Hi, > > I receive the following test errors after building numpy rev7229 from svn: > Yep, a bug slipped in the last commit, I am fixing it right now, David ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http:

[Numpy-discussion] Test failures for rev7299

Hi, I receive the following test errors after building numpy rev7229 from svn: == FAIL: test_simple_circular (test_multiarray.TestStackedNeighborhoodIter) -- Tra

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures on FreeBSD buildbot

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:48 PM, David Cournapeau < da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp> wrote: > Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > I'd just look at the difference and see if it exceeded some fraction > > of the expected value. There is the problem of zero, which could be > > handled in the usual way as d

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures on FreeBSD buildbot

Charles R Harris wrote: > > I'd just look at the difference and see if it exceeded some fraction > of the expected value. There is the problem of zero, which could be > handled in the usual way as diff < abserr + relerr. I think abserr > would need to be a new keyword with a default value. Since th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures on FreeBSD buildbot

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:16 PM, David Cournapeau < da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp> wrote: > Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:37 PM, David Cournapeau > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Charles R > > Harris >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures on FreeBSD buildbot

Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:37 PM, David Cournapeau > wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Charles R > Harris > wrote: > > > ERROR: test_nan_items (test_utils.TestApproxEqual) > > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures on FreeBSD buildbot

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:37 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Charles R > Harris wrote: > > > ERROR: test_nan_items (test_utils.TestApproxEqual) > > -- > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > Fil

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failures on FreeBSD buildbot

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > ERROR: test_nan_items (test_utils.TestApproxEqual) > -- > Traceback (most recent call last): > File > "/tmp/numpy-buildbot/b12/numpy-install/lib/python2.5/site-packages/

[Numpy-discussion] Test failures on FreeBSD buildbot

== ERROR: test_nan_array (test_utils.TestApproxEqual) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/tmp/numpy-buildbot/b12/numpy-install/lib/python2.5/site-packa

[Numpy-discussion] Test failures on 2.6

Hi, I'm getting a couple of test failures with Python 2.6, Numpy 1.2.0, Nose 0.10.4: nose version 0.10.4 ..

[Numpy-discussion] test failures when numpy built without atlas libraries.

When built without ATLAS, the following tests fail : == ERROR: check_testUfuncRegression (numpy.core.tests.test_ma.test_ufuncs) -- Traceback (most recent call las

Re: [Numpy-discussion] test failures

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Stefan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Charles > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:39:53PM -0700, Charles R Harris wrote: > > I believe these come from your latest commit. > > My changeset is here: > > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/changeset/4800 >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] test failures

Hi Charles On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:39:53PM -0700, Charles R Harris wrote: > I believe these come from your latest commit. My changeset is here: http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/changeset/4800 I don't see how that would have broken the tests you listed. Regards Stéfan __

[Numpy-discussion] test failures

Hi Stefan, I believe these come from your latest commit. File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/lib/tests/test_ufunclike.py", line 25, in test_ufunclike Failed example: nx.sign(a) Expected: array([ 1., -1., 0., 0., 1., -1.]) Got: array([ 1., -1., -1., 0., 1., -1.])