Re: [Numpy-discussion] test failure

2010-10-07 Thread John Mitchell
Thanks Ralf. This closes the issue for me. FYI When I set the precision to 4 I am able to repeat the test failure otherwise not. Its a bit odd the precision was changed somehow when I originally ran numpy.test() because I know that I didn't directly do that myself. >>> numpy.get_printoptions()

Re: [Numpy-discussion] test failure

2010-10-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:51 PM, John Mitchell wrote: > After spending a lot of time building 'numpy' (1.5.0) and 'scipy' (0.8.0) > I ran the following tests -- per what I read somewhere: > numpy.test() > > Out of several thousand small tests I found this one error -- perhaps its > not really an

[Numpy-discussion] test failure

2010-10-01 Thread John Mitchell
After spending a lot of time building 'numpy' (1.5.0) and 'scipy' (0.8.0) I ran the following tests -- per what I read somewhere: numpy.test() Out of several thousand small tests I found this one error -- perhaps its not really an error? This doesn't look serious but it can be bothersome when o

Re: [Numpy-discussion] test failure in numpy trunk

2009-03-24 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:15:21 -0400, Darren Dale wrote: > > I just performed an svn update, deleted my old build/ and > > site-packages/numpy*, reinstalled, and I see a new test failure on a 64 > > bit linux machine: > > > > ===

Re: [Numpy-discussion] test failure in numpy trunk

2009-03-24 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:15:21 -0400, Darren Dale wrote: > I just performed an svn update, deleted my old build/ and > site-packages/numpy*, reinstalled, and I see a new test failure on a 64 > bit linux machine: > > == > FAIL: test_uma

Re: [Numpy-discussion] test failure in numpy trunk

2009-03-24 Thread Darren Dale
2009/3/24 Charles R Harris > > > 2009/3/24 Darren Dale > > Hello, >> >> I just performed an svn update, deleted my old build/ and >> site-packages/numpy*, reinstalled, and I see a new test failure on a 64 bit >> linux machine: >> >> ===

Re: [Numpy-discussion] test failure in numpy trunk

2009-03-24 Thread Nils Wagner
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:20:53 -0600 Charles R Harris wrote: > 2009/3/24 Darren Dale > >> Hello, >> >> I just performed an svn update, deleted my old build/ >>and >> site-packages/numpy*, reinstalled, and I see a new test >>failure on a 64 bit >> linux machine: >> >> ==

Re: [Numpy-discussion] test failure in numpy trunk

2009-03-24 Thread Charles R Harris
2009/3/24 Darren Dale > Hello, > > I just performed an svn update, deleted my old build/ and > site-packages/numpy*, reinstalled, and I see a new test failure on a 64 bit > linux machine: > > == > FAIL: test_umath.TestComplexFunc

[Numpy-discussion] test failure in numpy trunk

2009-03-24 Thread Darren Dale
Hello, I just performed an svn update, deleted my old build/ and site-packages/numpy*, reinstalled, and I see a new test failure on a 64 bit linux machine: == FAIL: test_umath.TestComplexFunctions.test_loss_of_precision_longcompl

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Test failure with latest SVN

2008-01-18 Thread Ryan Krauss
I just built from svn in Ubuntu and get this same error. Ryan On Jan 16, 2008 5:26 AM, Robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am on OS X 10.5.1 and get a test failure with the latest numpy svn. > (Previously ran with no errors with svn as of a few weeks ago). > > test_zero_probability (numpy.tests.

[Numpy-discussion] Test failure with latest SVN

2008-01-16 Thread Robin
I am on OS X 10.5.1 and get a test failure with the latest numpy svn. (Previously ran with no errors with svn as of a few weeks ago). test_zero_probability (numpy.tests.test_random.TestMultinomial) ... ok == ERROR: Ticket #396 --

[Numpy-discussion] test failure: Ticket 396

2007-11-16 Thread Robin
Hello, Just thought I'd report this test failure with current svn (rev 4464) on Mac OS X 10.5 (could be a leopard issue?) since I hadn't seen it mentioned before. Oddly it only seems to fail in ipython, importing and running from the normal python interpreter all the tests pass. Actually, it only