Re: [Numpy-discussion] svd in numpy

2008-05-19 Thread David Cournapeau
Bruce Southey wrote: > Nripun Sredar wrote: > >> I am running on Windows Xp, Intel Xeon CPU. I'd like to fill in a few >> more things here. If I send 0 in the second and third argument of svd >> then I get the singular_values, but if its 1 then the problem >> persists. I've tried this on spar

Re: [Numpy-discussion] svd in numpy

2008-05-19 Thread Nripun Sredar
Thank You.. The problem is resolved On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Bruce Southey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nripun Sredar wrote: > > I am running on Windows Xp, Intel Xeon CPU. I'd like to fill in a few > > more things here. If I send 0 in the second and third argument of svd > > then I get

Re: [Numpy-discussion] svd in numpy

2008-05-19 Thread Bruce Southey
Nripun Sredar wrote: > I am running on Windows Xp, Intel Xeon CPU. I'd like to fill in a few > more things here. If I send 0 in the second and third argument of svd > then I get the singular_values, but if its 1 then the problem > persists. I've tried this on sparse and non-sparse matrices. This

Re: [Numpy-discussion] svd in numpy

2008-05-19 Thread Nripun Sredar
I am running on Windows Xp, Intel Xeon CPU. I'd like to fill in a few more things here. If I send 0 in the second and third argument of svd then I get the singular_values, but if its 1 then the problem persists. I've tried this on sparse and non-sparse matrices. This is with the latest windows bina

Re: [Numpy-discussion] svd in numpy

2008-05-18 Thread Zachary Pincus
On May 17, 2008, at 9:34 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > Nripun Sredar wrote: >> I have a sparse matrix 416x52. I tried to factorize this matrix using >> svd from numpy. But it didn't produce a result and looked like it is >> in an infinite loop. >> I tried a similar operation using random numbers i

Re: [Numpy-discussion] svd in numpy

2008-05-17 Thread David Cournapeau
Nripun Sredar wrote: > I have a sparse matrix 416x52. I tried to factorize this matrix using > svd from numpy. But it didn't produce a result and looked like it is > in an infinite loop. > I tried a similar operation using random numbers in the matrix. Even > this is in an infinite loop. > Did a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] svd in numpy

2008-05-16 Thread Bruce Southey
Nripun Sredar wrote: > I have a sparse matrix 416x52. I tried to factorize this matrix using > svd from numpy. But it didn't produce a result and looked like it is > in an infinite loop. > I tried a similar operation using random numbers in the matrix. Even > this is in an infinite loop. > Did a

[Numpy-discussion] svd in numpy

2008-05-16 Thread Nripun Sredar
I have a sparse matrix 416x52. I tried to factorize this matrix using svd from numpy. But it didn't produce a result and looked like it is in an infinite loop. I tried a similar operation using random numbers in the matrix. Even this is in an infinite loop. Did anyone else face a similar problem? C