On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 16:23, Marco Tuckner
wrote:
> Thanks to all who answered.
> This is really helpful!
>
>>> If you are still seeing actual calculation differences, we will
>>> need to see a complete, self-contained example that demonstrates
>>> the difference.
>>
>> To add a bit more detail -
Thanks to all who answered.
This is really helpful!
>> If you are still seeing actual calculation differences, we will
>> need to see a complete, self-contained example that demonstrates
>> the difference.
>
> To add a bit more detail -- unless you are explicitly specifying
> single precision flo
Robert Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 14:09, Marco Tuckner
>> In Python the numbers show:
>> 12.
>>
>> whereas in Excel I see:
>> 12.8
> If you are still seeing actual calculation differences, we will need
> to see a complete, self-contained example that demonstrates the
ke, 2010-03-03 kello 21:09 +0100, Marco Tuckner kirjoitti:
> am using the scikit.timeseries to convert a hourly timeseries to a lower
> frequency unsing the appropriate function [1].
>
> When I compare the result to the values calculated with a Pivot table in
> Excel there is a difference in the v
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 14:09, Marco Tuckner
wrote:
> Hello,
> am using the scikit.timeseries to convert a hourly timeseries to a lower
> frequency unsing the appropriate function [1].
>
> When I compare the result to the values calculated with a Pivot table in
> Excel there is a difference in the
Hello,
am using the scikit.timeseries to convert a hourly timeseries to a lower
frequency unsing the appropriate function [1].
When I compare the result to the values calculated with a Pivot table in
Excel there is a difference in the values which reaches quite high
values in the total sum of all
