Christopher Barker wrote:
> Robert Kern wrote:
>> "Official" binaries intended for distribution from scipy.org or scipy.sf.net
>> should not be linked against FFTW or UMFPACK since they are GPLed.
>
> Does that apply to binaries put up on pythonmac.org? It would be nice to
> have a "complete" ve
Robert Kern wrote:
> I would prefer that we use the Python binary from www.python.org. That should
> work on 10.3.9+.
+1 -- there have always been enough issue with Apple;'s python that it's
best to just use another version -- one binary for > 10.3.9 is the way
to go.
> "Official" binaries inte
On 11/30/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Barry Wark wrote:
>
> > Some remaining issues:
> > - which SDK to build against. Leopard ships with a Python build
> > against the 10.5 SDK. It would be much easier, at least initially, for
> > us to produce binaries against the Leopard Python 2
Barry Wark wrote:
> Some remaining issues:
> - which SDK to build against. Leopard ships with a Python build
> against the 10.5 SDK. It would be much easier, at least initially, for
> us to produce binaries against the Leopard Python 2.5.
I would prefer that we use the Python binary from www.pyth
On 11/29/07, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Barry Wark wrote:
> > Using the gfortran from http://r.research.att.com/tools/, it's trivial
> > to build a universal build from source. The instructions on scipy.org
> > won't lead you astray.
> >
> > I will ask around at work. Perhaps we
Even just a build of the last stable version will do it. Most people
(especially those who don't want to go through the hassle of compiling)
are going to be perfectly happy with a binary of the latest release.
Thanks!
Barry Wark wrote:
> Using the gfortran from http://r.research.att.com/tools/,
Barry Wark wrote:
> Using the gfortran from http://r.research.att.com/tools/, it's trivial
> to build a universal build from source. The instructions on scipy.org
> won't lead you astray.
>
> I will ask around at work. Perhaps we can start building universal
> scipy builds for distribution. Can any
Using the gfortran from http://r.research.att.com/tools/, it's trivial
to build a universal build from source. The instructions on scipy.org
won't lead you astray.
I will ask around at work. Perhaps we can start building universal
scipy builds for distribution. Can anyone from the scipy devs email
Joshua Lippai wrote:
> Chris Fonnesbeck used to distribute both PowerPC and Intel binaries,
> but he can't compile them for PowerPC at all anymore because he no
> longer has access to a PowerPC machine.
You can build fat binaries with a single machine -- either one. Whether
Chris wants to spend h
Hi Josh, you're right I should probably email the guy directly.
I eventually managed to compile it installing the latest xcode, the
latest cctool to fix the __dso_handle bug, the gfortran and a couple of
other things. It took me an entire afternoon and now I don't have errors
on the the scipy.te
On Nov 29, 2007 3:21 PM, Christopher Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Lippai wrote:
> > You should probably email the guy and ask him to make
> > older versions of the superpack available, or at least the last PPC
> > one he made. Best of luck.
>
> Even better would be Universal (fat) bin
Joshua Lippai wrote:
> You should probably email the guy and ask him to make
> older versions of the superpack available, or at least the last PPC
> one he made. Best of luck.
Even better would be Universal (fat) binaries -- I'm pretty sure this is
now possible, but haven't figured it out myself
It's actually pretty simple to compile it yourself once you've
installed the latest Xcode from http://developer.apple.com and X11
from the OS X Tiger install disc. The instructions on Scipy's official
OS X installation page ( http://scipy.org/Installing_SciPy/Mac_OS_X )
are great for that. That sai
Hi guys,
does anyone of you happen to have sitting somewhere a DMG of a recent
version of SciPy compiled for MacOSX 10.4?
The SciPy webpage does not carry official releases and it is sending me
to the Scipy Superpack by Chris Fonnesbeck but that superpack seems to
be for intel cpu only. I didn't
14 matches
Mail list logo
