Re: [Numpy-discussion] review request: introductory datetime documentation

2011-07-01 Thread Mark Wiebe
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > Just trying it out with 1.6: > > np.datetime64('now') > Out[6]: 2011-07-01 00:00:00 > > Well the time now is 07:01am. Is this expected behaviour? > The version of datetime in 1.6 is quite broken. When 1.6 was released, I thought it was proba

Re: [Numpy-discussion] review request: introductory datetime documentation

2011-07-01 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > Just trying it out with 1.6: > > np.datetime64('now') > Out[6]: 2011-07-01 00:00:00 > > I get In [1]: datetime64('now') Out[1]: numpy.datetime64('2011-07-01T07:18:35-0600') You need the development branch for trials, Mark has made a lot of f

Re: [Numpy-discussion] review request: introductory datetime documentation

2011-07-01 Thread Neal Becker
Just trying it out with 1.6: np.datetime64('now') Out[6]: 2011-07-01 00:00:00 Well the time now is 07:01am. Is this expected behaviour? ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussi

[Numpy-discussion] review request: introductory datetime documentation

2011-06-30 Thread Mark Wiebe
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/101 Thanks, Mark ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

[Numpy-discussion] review request for half type

2010-11-09 Thread Mark Wiebe
This set of patches fully implements a 16-bit floating point half type into NumPy. It's got a lot of changes, but I've tried to organize them logically so that it builds and the tests run after each patch. This took some tweaks to the building and ufunc generation code, so please check that, as p

Re: [Numpy-discussion] review request

2010-08-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'd appreciate a review of these changes: >> http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/tree/changes-for-1.5 >> http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/tree/deprecations >> >> > Lo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] review request

2010-08-14 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi, > > I'd appreciate a review of these changes: > http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/tree/changes-for-1.5 > http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/tree/deprecations > > Looks good to me as far as I am familiar with things. Chuck ___

[Numpy-discussion] review request

2010-08-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi, I'd appreciate a review of these changes: http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/tree/changes-for-1.5 http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/tree/deprecations Thanks, Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailma