Re: [Numpy-discussion] reshape docstrings conflicting

2008-04-26 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Hi Chuck, Charles R Harris wrote: [clip] > I noticed that you removed the ReST markup of the tables in sort > documentation. I think you should leave it in. Also the simplified table syntax header 1 header 2 header 3 line 1a line 1b line 1c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] reshape docstrings conflicting

2008-04-26 Thread Jarrod Millman
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I noticed that you removed the ReST markup of the tables in sort > documentation. I think you should leave it in. I haven't tried to render it, but I think he just changed the tables from ReST's grid table to ReST's si

Re: [Numpy-discussion] reshape docstrings conflicting

2008-04-26 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Pauli Virtanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > The ndarray.reshape docstring claims: > >"Also always returns a view or raises a ValueError if that is >impossible." > > whereas fromnumeric.reshape claims: > >"This will be a new view

[Numpy-discussion] reshape docstrings conflicting

2008-04-26 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Hi all, The ndarray.reshape docstring claims: "Also always returns a view or raises a ValueError if that is impossible." whereas fromnumeric.reshape claims: "This will be a new view object if possible; otherwise, it will be a copy." while the code paths for b