On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Brian Blais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> at least for me, that was the motivation. I am trying to build a simulation
> framework for part of the brain, which requires connected layers of nodes.
> A layer is either a 1D or 2D structure of nodes, with each node a
>
2008/5/17 Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/5/17 Brian Blais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> at least for me, that was the motivation. I am trying to build a simulation
>> framework for part of the brain, which requires connected layers of nodes.
>> A layer is either a 1D or 2D structure of no
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Charles R Harris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Charles R Harris
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Base classes also tend to have limited functionality th
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Charles R Harris
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Base classes also tend to have limited functionality that will be common
> to
> > all derived types. The object type in Python has only a few
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Charles R Harris
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Base classes also tend to have limited functionality that will be common
> to
> > all derived types. The object type in Python has only a few
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Charles R Harris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Base classes also tend to have limited functionality that will be common to
> all derived types. The object type in Python has only a few methods and
> attributes:
>
> In [4]: dir(object)
> Out[4]:
> ['__class__',
> '__
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> 2008/5/17 Brian Blais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> > at least for me, that was the motivation. I am trying to build a
>> simulation
>>
>
>
> From the response, the answer seems to be no, and that I should stick
> with the python loops for clarity. But also, the words of Anne
> Archibald, makes me think that I have made a bad choice by inheriting
> from ndarray, although I am not sure what a convenient alternative
> would be.
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2008/5/17 Brian Blais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > at least for me, that was the motivation. I am trying to build a
> simulation
> > framework for part of the brain, which requires connected layers of
> nodes.
> > A layer
2008/5/17 Brian Blais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> at least for me, that was the motivation. I am trying to build a simulation
> framework for part of the brain, which requires connected layers of nodes.
> A layer is either a 1D or 2D structure of nodes, with each node a
> relatively complex beast. R
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2008/5/17 Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Alan G Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 16 May 2008, Anne Archibald apparently wrote:
> >> > storing actual
2008/5/17 Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Alan G Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 16 May 2008, Anne Archibald apparently wrote:
>> > storing actual python objects in an array is probably not
>> > a good idea
>>
>> I have been wondering what
On May 17, 2008, at May 17:11:52 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Anne Archibald apparently wrote:
storing actual python objects in an array is probably not
a good idea
I have been wondering what people use object arrays for.
I have been guessing that it is for indexing convenienc
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Alan G Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2008, Anne Archibald apparently wrote:
> > storing actual python objects in an array is probably not
> > a good idea
>
> I have been wondering what people use object arrays for.
> I have been guessing that it
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Anne Archibald apparently wrote:
> storing actual python objects in an array is probably not
> a good idea
I have been wondering what people use object arrays for.
I have been guessing that it is for indexing convenience?
Are there other core motivations?
Alan Isaac
__
2008/5/16 Brian Blais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a custom array, which contains custom objects (I give a stripped down
> example below), and I want to loop over all of the elements of the array and
> call a method of the object. I can do it like:
> a=MyArray((5,5),MyObject,10)
>
> for
Hello,
I have a custom array, which contains custom objects (I give a
stripped down example below), and I want to loop over all of the
elements of the array and call a method of the object. I can do it
like:
a=MyArray((5,5),MyObject,10)
for obj in a.flat:
obj.update()
b
17 matches
Mail list logo
