On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:47, Brennan Williams
wrote:
> On 29/10/2010 6:35 a.m., Robert Kern wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:33, Brennan Williams
>> wrote:
>>> On 29/10/2010 2:34 a.m., Robert Kern wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:38, Brennan Williams
wrote:
> I hav
On 29/10/2010 6:35 a.m., Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:33, Brennan Williams
> wrote:
>> On 29/10/2010 2:34 a.m., Robert Kern wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:38, Brennan Williams
>>> wrote:
I have used both linear least squares and radial basis functions as
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:33, Brennan Williams
wrote:
> On 29/10/2010 2:34 a.m., Robert Kern wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:38, Brennan Williams
>> wrote:
>>> I have used both linear least squares and radial basis functions as a
>>> proxy equation, calculated from the results of comput
On 29/10/2010 2:34 a.m., Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:38, Brennan Williams
> wrote:
>> I have used both linear least squares and radial basis functions as a
>> proxy equation, calculated from the results of computer simulations
>> which are calculating some objective functi
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:38, Brennan Williams
wrote:
> I have used both linear least squares and radial basis functions as a
> proxy equation, calculated from the results of computer simulations
> which are calculating some objective function value based on a number of
> varied input parameters
I have used both linear least squares and radial basis functions as a
proxy equation, calculated from the results of computer simulations
which are calculating some objective function value based on a number of
varied input parameters.
As an alternative option I want to add a quadratic functi
