Hi Pearu,
On Dec 3, 2007 11:22 AM, Pearu Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Some additional notes:
>
> - note that f2py in numpy and in python-f2py are *different*
> tools and therefore python-f2py should not be considered
> depreciated more than python-numeric is. So, python-f2py
> should st
Some additional notes:
- note that f2py in numpy and in python-f2py are *different*
tools and therefore python-f2py should not be considered
depreciated more than python-numeric is. So, python-f2py
should stay provided python-numeric is there. It might be
appropiate to rename python-f2py to pytho
Ho,
f2py is part of numpy and therefore there is no need to
have python-f2py package. The version number of f2py
(2_3816, for instance), indicates which SVN commit changed
the f2py package and has local usage only.
python-f2py package could be retained only for backward
compatibilty for users who
Hi,
I am a comaintainer of the python-scipy package in Debian and now it
seems to be in quite a good shape. However, the python-numpy package
is quite a mess, so as it usually goes in opensource, I got fedup and
I tried to clean it. But I noticed, that f2py was moved from external
package into num
