On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
>> CMake does handle this automatically.
>> E.g. if include directories are changed (which you do by editing a
>> CMakeLists.txt or the cmake cache), all files which are affected by the are
>> rebuilt. If some library changes, everything linking
> CMake does handle this automatically.
> E.g. if include directories are changed (which you do by editing a
> CMakeLists.txt or the cmake cache), all files which are affected by the are
> rebuilt. If some library changes, everything linking to this library is
> linked again.
> If any of the files
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:56 PM, David Cournapeau
wrote:
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> That's exactly what I don't like about cmake - it means you can't
>>> produce accurate builds (you need to rerun cmake everytime you change
>>> the configuration or dependencies, whereas this is automatic with
>>>
Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> That's exactly what I don't like about cmake - it means you can't
>> produce accurate builds (you need to rerun cmake everytime you change
>> the configuration or dependencies, whereas this is automatic with
>> scons/waf). It also have (used to have) very poor documentation
> That's exactly what I don't like about cmake - it means you can't
> produce accurate builds (you need to rerun cmake everytime you change
> the configuration or dependencies, whereas this is automatic with
> scons/waf). It also have (used to have) very poor documentation unless
> you buy the boo
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Brian Granger wrote:
>> I don't find it that surprising - numpy and scipy require some
>> relatively advanced features (mixed language and cross-platform with
>> support for many toolchains). Within the open source tools, I know
>> only two which can handle those re
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:39 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> Yes, I am investigating cmake, it's pretty cool. I wrote some macros
> for cython etc. What I like about cmake is that it is cross platform
> and it just produces makefiles on linux, or visual studio files (or
> whatever) on windows. When
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
>> Yes, I am investigating cmake, it's pretty cool. I wrote some macros
>> for cython etc. What I like about cmake is that it is cross platform
>> and it just produces makefiles on linux, or visual studio files (or
>> whatever) on windows. Whe
> Yes, I am investigating cmake, it's pretty cool. I wrote some macros
> for cython etc. What I like about cmake is that it is cross platform
> and it just produces makefiles on linux, or visual studio files (or
> whatever) on windows. When I get more experience with it, I'll post
> here.
Yes, wh
> I don't find it that surprising - numpy and scipy require some
> relatively advanced features (mixed language and cross-platform with
> support for many toolchains). Within the open source tools, I know
> only two which can handle those requirements: scons and cmake. For
> example, it would almos
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 3:10 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>>> Sorry for the confusion: numscons is NOT the preferred build system.
>>> The current numpy.distutils extensions, as shipped by numpy, is the
>>> preferred one. Numsco
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>> Sorry for the confusion: numscons is NOT the preferred build system.
>> The current numpy.distutils extensions, as shipped by numpy, is the
>> preferred one. Numscons is more an experiment, if you want.
>
> Ah, I see, thanks for
> I see. I think it's a bit confusing that one needs to build a new
> build system just to build numpy, e.g. that both distutils and scons
> are not good enough.
I would not say that numscons is a *new* build system. Rather, I look
at numscons as a glue layer that allows scons to be used within
d
Hi David,
> Sorry for the confusion: numscons is NOT the preferred build system.
> The current numpy.distutils extensions, as shipped by numpy, is the
> preferred one. Numscons is more an experiment, if you want.
Ah, I see, thanks for the clarification.
>> So is it supposed to be in Debian?
>
>
Hi Ondrej,
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have couple beginners questions about numscons. What is the
> preferred build system for numpy now, is it numscons? The README
> doesn't mention numscons, so I am a bit confused what the future plan
> is.
>
Sorry for the
Hi,
I have couple beginners questions about numscons. What is the
preferred build system for numpy now, is it numscons? The README
doesn't mention numscons, so I am a bit confused what the future plan
is.
Also by doing:
$ python setupscons.py install
Running from numpy source directory.
Tracebac
16 matches
Mail list logo
