On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:52 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Sebastian Walter
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:40 PM, wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Charles R Harris
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM, wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Sebastian Walter
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:40 PM, wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM, wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>>>
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:40 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Charles R Harris
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Charles R Harris
>>> > wr
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM, wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Charles R Harris
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:33 AM,
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Charles R Harris
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Charles R Harris
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Charles R Harris
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 20
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Charles R Harris <
>> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:08 AM
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:08 AM, wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a way in numpy (or scipy) to get an infinite expansion for
>>> the inverse of
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:08 AM, wrote:
>
>> Is there a way in numpy (or scipy) to get an infinite expansion for
>> the inverse of a polynomial (for a finite number of terms)
>>
>> np.poly1d([ -0.8, 1])**(-1)
>>
>> application for ex
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:08 AM, wrote:
> Is there a way in numpy (or scipy) to get an infinite expansion for
> the inverse of a polynomial (for a finite number of terms)
>
> np.poly1d([ -0.8, 1])**(-1)
>
> application for example the MA representation of an AR(1)
>
>
Hmm, I've been working on a
Is there a way in numpy (or scipy) to get an infinite expansion for
the inverse of a polynomial (for a finite number of terms)
np.poly1d([ -0.8, 1])**(-1)
application for example the MA representation of an AR(1)
and fractional powers
np.poly1d([ -1, 1])**0.5
this is useful for fractionally i
11 matches
Mail list logo