Sebastian Haase wrote:
> Which file(s) should I be looking for?
numpy/core/src/multiarraymodule.c . You will need to modify the functions
array_where() and PyArray_Where(). Be sure to update ma.py to match, and update
numarray/functions.py to make use of the out= argument (numarray had it and we
On 7/15/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sebastian Haase wrote:
> > On 7/14/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Sebastian Haase wrote:
>
> >>> 2) Could we have another optional argument "dtype" in numpy.where()?
> >>> Otherwise I would have to always write code like this:
>
On 7/15/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sebastian Haase wrote:
> > On 7/14/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Sebastian Haase wrote:
>
> >>> 2) Could we have another optional argument "dtype" in numpy.where()?
> >>> Otherwise I would have to always write code like this:
>
Sebastian Haase wrote:
> On 7/14/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sebastian Haase wrote:
>>> 2) Could we have another optional argument "dtype" in numpy.where()?
>>> Otherwise I would have to always write code like this:
>>> a = N.where( arr>x, 1.0, 0.0)
>>> a = a.astype(N.float32)
>>
On 7/14/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sebastian Haase wrote:
> > Hi.
> > Two things.
> > 1) The doc-string of numpy.where() states that transpose(where(cond,
> > x,y)) whould always return a 2d-array. How can this be true?? It also
> > says (before) that if x,y are given where(cond,x
Sebastian Haase wrote:
> Hi.
> Two things.
> 1) The doc-string of numpy.where() states that transpose(where(cond,
> x,y)) whould always return a 2d-array. How can this be true?? It also
> says (before) that if x,y are given where(cond,x,y) always returns an
> array of the same shape as cond
I
Hi.
Two things.
1) The doc-string of numpy.where() states that transpose(where(cond,
x,y)) whould always return a 2d-array. How can this be true?? It also
says (before) that if x,y are given where(cond,x,y) always returns an
array of the same shape as cond
2) Could we have another optional ar