On 03/29/2010 10:17 AM, Ryan May wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Bruce Southey wrote:
>
>> On 03/27/2010 01:31 PM, Ryan May wrote:
>>
>>> Because of the call to asarray(), the mask is completely discarded and
>>> you end up with identical results to an unmasked array,
>>> which
Hi,
I decided that having actual code that does what I want and keeps
backwards compatibility (and adds tests) might be better than arguing
semantics. I've updated my patch to:
* Uses the array.sum() method instead of add.reduce to make subclasses
fully work (this was still breaking masked array
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Bruce Southey wrote:
> On 03/27/2010 01:31 PM, Ryan May wrote:
>> Because of the call to asarray(), the mask is completely discarded and
>> you end up with identical results to an unmasked array,
>> which is not what I'd expect. Worse, the actual numeric value of
On 03/27/2010 01:31 PM, Ryan May wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:12 AM, wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Ryan May wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ryan May wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:57 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:23 PM, wrote:
> subclasses of ndarray, like masked_arrays and quantities, and classes
> that delegate to array calculations, like pandas, can redefine
> anything. So there is not much that can be relied on if any subclass
> is allowed to be used inside a function
>
> e.
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Ryan May wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:23 PM, wrote:
>> Matrices have been part of numpy for a long time and your patch would
>> break backwards compatibility in a pretty serious way.
>
> Yeah, and I should admit that I realize that makes this particular
>
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:23 PM, wrote:
> Matrices have been part of numpy for a long time and your patch would
> break backwards compatibility in a pretty serious way.
Yeah, and I should admit that I realize that makes this particular
patch a no-go. However, that to me doesn't put the issue to
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Ryan May wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:12 AM, wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Ryan May wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ryan May wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:57 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Ryan May
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:12 AM, wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Ryan May wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ryan May wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:57 PM, wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Ryan May wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found that trapz() doesn
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Ryan May wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ryan May wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:57 PM, wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Ryan May wrote:
Hi,
I found that trapz() doesn't work with subclasses:
http://projects.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ryan May wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:57 PM, wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Ryan May wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I found that trapz() doesn't work with subclasses:
>>>
>>> http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1438
>>>
>>> A simple patch (attache
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:57 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Ryan May wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found that trapz() doesn't work with subclasses:
>>
>> http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1438
>>
>> A simple patch (attached) to change asarray() to asanyarray() fixes
>> the problem
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Ryan May wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found that trapz() doesn't work with subclasses:
>
> http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1438
>
> A simple patch (attached) to change asarray() to asanyarray() fixes
> the problem fine.
Are you sure this function works with matrices
Hi,
I found that trapz() doesn't work with subclasses:
http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1438
A simple patch (attached) to change asarray() to asanyarray() fixes
the problem fine.
Ryan
--
Ryan May
Graduate Research Assistant
School of Meteorology
University of Oklahoma
fix_trapz_subcla
14 matches
Mail list logo
