On 7/24/2014 4:42 PM, Eelco Hoogendoorn wrote:
> This isn't a bug report, but rather a feature request.
I'm not sure statement this is correct. The mean of a float32 array
can certainly be computed as a float32. Currently this is
not necessarily what happens, not even approximately.
That feels a
t;
Sent: 24-7-2014 20:04
To: "numpy-discussion@scipy.org"
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.mean still broken for large float32arrays
Le 24/07/2014 12:55, Thomas Unterthiner a écrit :
> I don't agree. The problem is that I expect `mean` to do something
> reasonable. T
4 18:09
To: "Discussion of Numerical Python"
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.mean still broken for large float32arrays
On 7/24/2014 5:59 AM, Eelco Hoogendoorn wrote to Thomas:
> np.mean isn't broken; your understanding of floating point number is.
This comment seems to conflate se
ssage-
From: "Julian Taylor"
Sent: 24-7-2014 14:56
To: "Discussion of Numerical Python"
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.mean still broken for large float32arrays
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Fabien wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 24.07.2014 11:59, Eelco H
