Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy and cython in pure python mode

2009-09-23 Thread Sebastian Haase
Thanks for all the replies ! On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > Robert Kern wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:33, Sebastian Haase wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I'm not subscribed to the cython list - hoping enough people would >>> care to justify my post here: >>> > The po

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy and cython in pure python mode

2009-09-23 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
Robert Kern wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:33, Sebastian Haase wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'm not subscribed to the cython list - hoping enough people would >> care to justify my post here: >> The post might be justified, but it is a question of available knowledge as well. I nearly missed t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy and cython in pure python mode

2009-09-22 Thread Robert Kern
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:33, Sebastian Haase wrote: > Hi, > I'm not subscribed to the cython list - hoping enough people would > care to justify my post here: > > I know that cython's numpy is still getting better and better over > time, but is it already today possible to have numpy support whe

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy and cython in pure python mode

2009-09-22 Thread Sturla Molden
Sebastian Haase skrev: > I know that cython's numpy is still getting better and better over > time, but is it already today possible to have numpy support when > using Cython in "pure python" mode? > I'm not sure. There is this odd memoryview syntax: import cython view = cython.int[:,:](my2darr

[Numpy-discussion] numpy and cython in pure python mode

2009-09-21 Thread Sebastian Haase
Hi, I'm not subscribed to the cython list - hoping enough people would care to justify my post here: I know that cython's numpy is still getting better and better over time, but is it already today possible to have numpy support when using Cython in "pure python" mode? I like the idea of being abl