On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Bruce Southey wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Ralf Gommers <
> ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Charles R Harris
> >> wrote:
>
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Ralf,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ralf Gommers
>>> wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ralf,
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ralf Gommers <
>> ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> It's been a little ov
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It's been a little over 6 months since the release of 1.6.0 and the NA
>> debate has quieted down, so I'd like to ask your opinion on the timing of
>>
Hi Ralf,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's been a little over 6 months since the release of 1.6.0 and the NA
> debate has quieted down, so I'd like to ask your opinion on the timing of
> 1.7.0. It looks to me like we have a healthy amount of bug fixes and sma
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Ralf Gommers
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Ralf Gommers <
> ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 22:11, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > To be a bit more detailed here, these are the most significant pull
> requests
> > / patches that I think can be merged with a limited amount of work:
> > meshgrid enhancements: ht
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Ralf Gommers
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> It's been a little over 6 months since the release of 1.6.0 and the NA
>>> debate has quieted down,
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 22:11, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> To be a bit more detailed here, these are the most significant pull requests
> / patches that I think can be merged with a limited amount of work:
> meshgrid enhancements: http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/966
> sample_from function: https:/
Le 07/12/2011 12:42, Pierre GM a écrit :
> Ever tried to use genfromtxt ?
You'll guess I didn't ... next time I'll do ;-)
Thanks for the tip !
Best,
Pierre
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinf
On Dec 07, 2011, at 11:24 , Pierre Haessig wrote:
>
> Now for my personal use, I was not so frustrated by loading performance
> but rather by NA support, so I wrote my own loadCsv function to get a
> masked array. It was nor beautiful, neither very efficient, but it does
> the job !
Ever trie
Le 06/12/2011 23:13, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> I think R has two functions read.csv and read.csv2, where read.csv2 is
> capable of dealing with things like European decimal format.
>
I may be wrong, but from R's help I understand that read.csv, read.csv2,
read.delim, ...
are just calls to read.tabl
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's been a little over 6 months since the release of 1.6.0 and the NA
> debate has quieted down, so I'd like to ask your opinion on the timing of
> 1.7.0. It looks to me like we have a healthy amount of bug fixes and small
> impro
On 06.12.2011, at 11:13PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> This isn't the place for this discussion but we should start talking
> about building a *high performance* flat file loading solution with
> good column type inference and sensible defaults, etc. It's clear that
> loadtable is aiming for highest com
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It's been a little over 6 months since the release of 1.6.0 and the NA
>> debate has quieted down, so I'd like to ask your opinion on the timing of
>> 1.7.0. It look
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's been a little over 6 months since the release of 1.6.0 and the NA
> debate has quieted down, so I'd like to ask your opinion on the timing of
> 1.7.0. It looks to me like we have a healthy amount of bug fixes and small
> improv
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Travis Oliphant
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I like the idea. Is there resolution to the NA question?
>>>
>>
>> No, people still disagree and are likely to do so for years to come with
>> no end
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
>> I like the idea. Is there resolution to the NA question?
>>
>
> No, people still disagree and are likely to do so for years to come with
> no end in sight. That's why the pre
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> I like the idea. Is there resolution to the NA question?
>
No, people still disagree and are likely to do so for years to come with no
end in sight. That's why the preview label.
Chuck
___
NumP
I like the idea. Is there resolution to the NA question?
--
Travis Oliphant
(on a mobile)
512-826-7480
On Dec 5, 2011, at 2:43 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's been a little over 6 months since the release of 1.6.0 and the NA debate
> has quieted down, so I'd like to ask your opi
Hi all,
It's been a little over 6 months since the release of 1.6.0 and the NA
debate has quieted down, so I'd like to ask your opinion on the timing of
1.7.0. It looks to me like we have a healthy amount of bug fixes and small
improvements, plus three larger chucks of work:
- datetime
- NA
- Ben
21 matches
Mail list logo
