Got it.
Thank you very much,
Nadav
-Original Message-
From: numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org on behalf of Pauli Virtanen
Sent: Mon 19-Jul-10 15:47
To: Discussion of Numerical Python
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy 1.5 or 2.0
ma, 2010-07-19 kello 15:10 +0300, Nadav Horesh
ma, 2010-07-19 kello 15:10 +0300, Nadav Horesh kirjoitti:
> Till now I see that numpy2 plays well with PIL, Matplotlib, scipy and
> maybe some other packages. Should I expect that it might break?
If the other packages are compiled against Numpy 1.4.1 or earlier, then
yes, they are expected to bre
Python
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy 1.5 or 2.0
> What is the difference between these two versions? I usually check out
> the svn version (now 2.0) and it compiles well with python 2.6, 2.7 and
> 3.1.
Binary compatibility with previous versions.
Moreover, 2.0 will likely
> What is the difference between these two versions? I usually check out
> the svn version (now 2.0) and it compiles well with python 2.6, 2.7 and
> 3.1.
Binary compatibility with previous versions.
Moreover, 2.0 will likely contain a refactored core.
_
What is the difference between these two versions? I usually check out the svn
version (now 2.0) and it compiles well with python 2.6, 2.7 and 3.1.
Nadav.
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/li
