On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:56 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:42 PM, René Dudfield wrote:
>
> >
> > yeah, I completely understand the unfortunate packaging situation (eg,
> some
> > of my packages do not work with this install method).
> >
> > Here is a simple package requ
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:42 PM, René Dudfield wrote:
>
> yeah, I completely understand the unfortunate packaging situation (eg, some
> of my packages do not work with this install method).
>
> Here is a simple package requiring numpy. It uses buildout
> (http://www.buildout.org/). To help eas
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:16 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:34 PM, René Dudfield wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the other day I tried installing numpy with easy_install, and did not
> have
> > much luck with python2.6.
>
> What problem exactly do you have ?
>
> Since 1.3.0, the
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:34 PM, René Dudfield wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the other day I tried installing numpy with easy_install, and did not have
> much luck with python2.6.
What problem exactly do you have ?
Since 1.3.0, the release process for numpy uses virtualenv internally
to build the installers,
Hi,
the other day I tried installing numpy with easy_install, and did not have
much luck with python2.6.
To reproduce, try installing with easy_install-2.6, or with buildout.
The work around is to just install it in another way (eg, dmg or with
setup.py install).
cheers,
__
