Pierre GM-2 wrote:
>
> Mmh, probably a bug, I'd say.
> Mind opening a ticket ?
> Thanks in advance
> P.
>
>
Done - Ticket #1657
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/np.ma.masked_invalid-and-precision-tp30100542p30107931.html
Sent from the Numpy-discussion mailing list arc
On Oct 31, 2010, at 9:28 PM, bevan jenkins wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am not sure if the following is a bug or not. I recently tried to set the
> print precision in numpy but it didn't seem to make a difference. It seems
> that the use of np.ma.masked_invalid results in arrays printing precision of
Hello,
I am not sure if the following is a bug or not. I recently tried to set the
print precision in numpy but it didn't seem to make a difference. It seems
that the use of np.ma.masked_invalid results in arrays printing precision of
12 regardless of the default setting or any subsequent settin
