On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Ralf Gommers
>> Date: Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:31 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Numpy-disc
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Ralf Gommers
> Date: Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] np.histogramdd of empty data
> To: Nils Becker
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:3
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ralf Gommers
Date: Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] np.histogramdd of empty data
To: Nils Becker
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Nils Becker wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> I cloned numpy/master and played around
Hi Ralf,
I cloned numpy/master and played around a little.
when giving the bins explicitely, now histogram2d and histogramdd work
as expected in all tests i tried.
However, some of the cases with missing bin specification appear
somewhat inconsistent.
The first question is if creating arbitrar
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Nils Becker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering why histogram2d and histogramdd raise a ValueError when
> fed with empty data of the correct dimensions. I came across this as a
> corner case when calling histogram2d from my own specialized histogram
> function.
Many
Hi,
I was wondering why histogram2d and histogramdd raise a ValueError when
fed with empty data of the correct dimensions. I came across this as a
corner case when calling histogram2d from my own specialized histogram
function.
In comparison, histogram does handle this case correctly when bins ar
