On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Geoffrey Irving wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If I create an mmap'ed array, and then generate another array
> referencing only its base, destruction of the original mmap'ed array
> closes the mmap. The second array is then prone to segfaults.
>
> I think the best fix is to
Hello,
If I create an mmap'ed array, and then generate another array
referencing only its base, destruction of the original mmap'ed array
closes the mmap. The second array is then prone to segfaults.
I think the best fix is to put the responsibility for flushing the
mmap onto the actual mmap obj
