On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> but is as good as dot right now except it doesn't handle object arrays.
>
>
>
> This is a fairly low standard. :-(
>
Meaning as fast. I expe
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> but is as good as dot right now except it doesn't handle object arrays.
This is a fairly low standard. :-(
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/ma
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The problem arises when multiplying a stack of matrices times a vector.
>> PEP465 defines this as appending a '1' to the dimensions of the v
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The problem arises when multiplying a stack of matrices times a vector.
>> PEP465 defines this as appending a '1' to the dimensions of the vector and
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> The problem arises when multiplying a stack of matrices times a vector.
> PEP465 defines this as appending a '1' to the dimensions of the vector and
> doing the defined stacked matrix multiply, then removing the last dimension
> from the
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> The problem arises when multiplying a stack of matrices times a vector.
> PEP465 defines this as appending a '1' to the dimensions of the vector and
> doing the defined stacked matrix multiply, then removing the last dimension
> from the
Hi All,
The problem arises when multiplying a stack of matrices times a vector.
PEP465 defines this as appending a '1' to the dimensions of the vector and
doing the defined stacked matrix multiply, then removing the last dimension
from the result. Note that in the middle step we have a stack of ma
