On 7/12/2012 1:45 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> I'd actually like to see out= as a kw-only arg.
That would be great.
Numpy 2.0?
Alan Isaac
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discuss
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> I've been bitten several times by this.
>
> logical_or (a, b, c)
>
> is silently accepted when I really meant
>
> logical_or (logical_or (a, b), c)
>
> because the logic functions are binary, where I expected them to be m-ary.
>
> Dunno if anyt
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> I've been bitten several times by this.
>
> logical_or (a, b, c)
>
> is silently accepted when I really meant
>
> logical_or (logical_or (a, b), c)
>
> because the logic functions are binary, where I expected them to be m-ary.
>
> Dunno if any
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 16:21 +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Henry Gomersall
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:53 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> >> I've been bitten several times by this.
> >>
> >> logical_or (a, b, c)
> >>
> >> is silently accepted when I really m
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Henry Gomersall wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:53 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
>> I've been bitten several times by this.
>>
>> logical_or (a, b, c)
>>
>> is silently accepted when I really meant
>>
>> logical_or (logical_or (a, b), c)
>>
>> because the logic funct
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:53 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> I've been bitten several times by this.
>
> logical_or (a, b, c)
>
> is silently accepted when I really meant
>
> logical_or (logical_or (a, b), c)
>
> because the logic functions are binary, where I expected them to be
> m-ary.
I don't
I've been bitten several times by this.
logical_or (a, b, c)
is silently accepted when I really meant
logical_or (logical_or (a, b), c)
because the logic functions are binary, where I expected them to be m-ary.
Dunno if anything can be done about it.
Sure would like it if they were m-ary and
