On 31 May 2011, at 21:28, Pierre GM wrote:
> On May 31, 2011, at 6:37 PM, Derek Homeier wrote:
>
>> On 31 May 2011, at 18:25, Pierre GM wrote:
>>
>>> On May 31, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Derek Homeier wrote:
I think stuff like multiple delimiters should have been dealt with
before, as the r
Derek Homeier wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 31 May 2011, at 13:56, cgraves wrote:
>
>> I've downloaded the latest numpy (1.6.0) and loadtxt has the ndmin
>> option,
>> however neither genfromtxt nor recfromtxt, which use loadtxt, have it.
>> Should they have inherited the option? Who can make
On May 31, 2011, at 6:37 PM, Derek Homeier wrote:
> On 31 May 2011, at 18:25, Pierre GM wrote:
>
>> On May 31, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Derek Homeier wrote:
>>>
>>> I think stuff like multiple delimiters should have been dealt with
>>> before, as the right place to insert the ndmin code (which include
On 31 May 2011, at 18:25, Pierre GM wrote:
> On May 31, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Derek Homeier wrote:
>>
>> I think stuff like multiple delimiters should have been dealt with
>> before, as the right place to insert the ndmin code (which includes
>> the decision to squeeze or not to squeeze as well as to
On May 31, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Derek Homeier wrote:
>
> I think stuff like multiple delimiters should have been dealt with
> before, as the right place to insert the ndmin code (which includes
> the decision to squeeze or not to squeeze as well as to add additional
> dimensions, if required)
On 31 May 2011, at 17:45, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
> At this point, I wonder if it might be smarter to create
> a .atleast_Nd() function and use that everywhere it is needed.
> Having similar logic tailored for each loading function might be a
> little dangerous if bug fixes are made to one, b
On 31 May 2011, at 17:33, Bruce Southey wrote:
>>> It certainly would make sense to provide the same functionality for
>>> genfromtxt (which should then be inherited by [nd,ma,rec]fromtxt),
>>> so
>>> I'd go ahead and file a feature (enhancement) request. I can't
>>> promise
>>> I can take car
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Bruce Southey wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 10:18 AM, Pierre GM wrote:
> > On May 31, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Derek Homeier wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Chris,
> >>
> >> On 31 May 2011, at 13:56, cgraves wrote:
> >>
> >>> I've downloaded the latest numpy (1.6.0) and loadtxt has the ndm
On 05/31/2011 10:18 AM, Pierre GM wrote:
> On May 31, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Derek Homeier wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> On 31 May 2011, at 13:56, cgraves wrote:
>>
>>> I've downloaded the latest numpy (1.6.0) and loadtxt has the ndmin
>>> option,
>>> however neither genfromtxt nor recfromtxt, which use l
On May 31, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Derek Homeier wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 31 May 2011, at 13:56, cgraves wrote:
>
>> I've downloaded the latest numpy (1.6.0) and loadtxt has the ndmin
>> option,
>> however neither genfromtxt nor recfromtxt, which use loadtxt, have it.
>> Should they have inherited
Hi Chris,
On 31 May 2011, at 13:56, cgraves wrote:
> I've downloaded the latest numpy (1.6.0) and loadtxt has the ndmin
> option,
> however neither genfromtxt nor recfromtxt, which use loadtxt, have it.
> Should they have inherited the option? Who can make it happen?
you are mistaken, genfromt
Ralf Gommers-2 wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Derek Homeier <
> de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 6 May 2011, at 07:53, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > >> Looks okay, and I agree that it's better to fix it now. The timing
>> > >> is a bit unfortunate though,
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Derek Homeier <
de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
>
> On 6 May 2011, at 07:53, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
> >
> > >> Looks okay, and I agree that it's better to fix it now. The timing
> > >> is a bit unfortunate though, just after RC2. I'll have closer look
>
On 6 May 2011, at 07:53, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
> >> Looks okay, and I agree that it's better to fix it now. The timing
> >> is a bit unfortunate though, just after RC2. I'll have closer look
> >> tomorrow and if it can go in, probably tag RC3.
> >>
> >> If in the meantime a few more people could
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Derek Homeier <
de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
>
> On 5 May 2011, at 22:53, Derek Homeier wrote:
>
> >>
> >> However, the problem that ndmin is supposed to address is not fixed
> >> by the current implementation for the rc. Essentially, a single-
> >
On 5 May 2011, at 22:53, Derek Homeier wrote:
>>
>> However, the problem that ndmin is supposed to address is not fixed
>> by the current implementation for the rc. Essentially, a single-
>> row, multi-column file with ndmin=2 comes out as a Nx1 array which
>> is the same result for a multi-row,
On 5 May 2011, at 22:31, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Paul Anton Letnes
> > wrote:
>
> O
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Paul Anton Letnes <
>>> paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Paul Anton Letnes <
>> paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 5. mai 2011, at 08.49, Benjamin Root wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On W
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Paul Anton Letnes <
> paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 5. mai 2011, at 08.49, Benjamin Root wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Paul Anton Letnes <
>> paul.anton.let...@g
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Paul Anton Letnes <
paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5. mai 2011, at 08.49, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Paul Anton Letnes <
> paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 4. mai 2011, at 20.33, Benjamin Root wrote:
On 5. mai 2011, at 08.49, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Paul Anton Letnes
> wrote:
>
> On 4. mai 2011, at 20.33, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Derek Homeier
> > wrote:
> > On 05.05.2011, at 2:40AM, Paul Anton Letnes wrote:
> >
> >
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Paul Anton Letnes <
> paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 4. mai 2011, at 20.33, Benjamin Root wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Derek Homeier <
>> de...@astro.physik.uni-goettinge
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Paul Anton Letnes <
paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 4. mai 2011, at 20.33, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Derek Homeier <
> de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
> > On 05.05.2011, at 2:40AM, Paul Anton Letnes wrote:
>
On 4. mai 2011, at 20.33, Benjamin Root wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Derek Homeier
> wrote:
> On 05.05.2011, at 2:40AM, Paul Anton Letnes wrote:
>
> > But: Isn't the numpy.atleast_2d and numpy.atleast_1d functions written for
> > this? Shouldn't we reuse them? Perhaps it's overkil
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Derek Homeier <
de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
> On 05.05.2011, at 2:40AM, Paul Anton Letnes wrote:
>
> > But: Isn't the numpy.atleast_2d and numpy.atleast_1d functions written
> for this? Shouldn't we reuse them? Perhaps it's overkill, and perhaps it
On 05.05.2011, at 2:40AM, Paul Anton Letnes wrote:
> But: Isn't the numpy.atleast_2d and numpy.atleast_1d functions written for
> this? Shouldn't we reuse them? Perhaps it's overkill, and perhaps it will
> reintroduce the 'transposed' problem?
Yes, good point, one could replace the
X.shape = (
On 4. mai 2011, at 17.34, Derek Homeier wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I've got back to your suggestion re. the ndmin flag for loadtxt from a few
> weeks ago...
>
> On 27.03.2011, at 12:09PM, Paul Anton Letnes wrote:
>
1562:
I attach a possible patch. This could also be the default
be
Hi Paul,
I've got back to your suggestion re. the ndmin flag for loadtxt from a few
weeks ago...
On 27.03.2011, at 12:09PM, Paul Anton Letnes wrote:
>>> 1562:
>>> I attach a possible patch. This could also be the default
>>> behavior to my mind, since the function caller can simply call
>>
29 matches
Mail list logo
