On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Craig Yoshioka wrote:
> yup, duplicate field names given. I didn't commit the non-working version
> and I didn't want to mess up my working code so I tried duplicating the dtype
> in a new file and couldn't recreate the error. I suppose the answer to my
> ques
yup, duplicate field names given. I didn't commit the non-working version and
I didn't want to mess up my working code so I tried duplicating the dtype in a
new file and couldn't recreate the error. I suppose the answer to my question
is, there is no limit to the number of records? Must have
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Craig Yoshioka wrote:
> duplicate column in dtype?
>
"Duplicate field names given."? Can you post code to replicate?
> I just consolidated some of the columns and the error went away... none had
> duplicate field names... hence the question.
>
I don't think this
duplicate column in dtype?
I just consolidated some of the columns and the error went away... none had
duplicate field names... hence the question.
On Aug 1, 2011, at 11:18 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
>
> On Aug 2, 2011, at 1:20 AM, Craig Yoshioka wrote:
>
>> Is there a limit to the number of field
On Aug 2, 2011, at 1:20 AM, Craig Yoshioka wrote:
> Is there a limit to the number of fields a numpy recarray can have? I was
> getting a strange error about a duplicate column name, but it wasn't a
> duplicate.
And the error was… ?
___
NumPy-Discu
Is there a limit to the number of fields a numpy recarray can have? I was
getting a strange error about a duplicate column name, but it wasn't a
duplicate.
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/lis
