On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Craig Yoshioka wrote:
> Thanks, I will. I was just seeing if there was any intention of adding this
> to type of support to numpy directly. It would be faster, and I'm sure it
> would make projects like dataarray much simpler to implement (dataarray does
> a lo
I'm glad datarray is still active. :)
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Craig Yoshioka wrote:
> Thanks, I will. I was just seeing if there was any intention of adding this
> to type of support to numpy directly. It would be faster, and I'm sure it
> would make projects like dataarray much simple
Thanks, I will. I was just seeing if there was any intention of adding this to
type of support to numpy directly. It would be faster, and I'm sure it would
make projects like dataarray much simpler to implement (dataarray does a lot
more than my suggestion).
On May 26, 2011, at 4:53 AM, Wes Mc
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Craig Yoshioka wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've read some discussions about adding labeled axes, and even ticks, to
> numpy arrays (such as in Luis' dataarray).
> I have recently found that the ability to label axes would be very helpful
> to me, but I'd like to keep the i
Hi all,
I've read some discussions about adding labeled axes, and even ticks, to numpy
arrays (such as in Luis' dataarray).
I have recently found that the ability to label axes would be very helpful to
me, but I'd like to keep the implementation as lightweight as possible.
The reason I woul
