Hi Neil,
sure...I aeh, knew this...of course...[?]
I'm using shuffle with a list of indices now...
Thanks,
Jan
<<330.gif>>___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On 2010-01-26 10:22 , Jan Strube wrote:
> Dear Josef and Keith,
>
> thank you both for your suggestions. I think intersect would be what I
> want for it makes clean code.
> I have, however, spotted the problem:
> I was mistakenly under the assumption that random_integers returns
> unique entries, w
Dear Josef and Keith,
thank you both for your suggestions. I think intersect would be what I want
for it makes clean code.
I have, however, spotted the problem:
I was mistakenly under the assumption that random_integers returns unique
entries, which is of course not guaranteed, so that the random
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Keith Goodman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Jan Strube wrote:
>> Dear List,
>>
>> I'm trying to speed up a piece of code that selects a subsample based on
>> some criteria:
>> Setup:
>> I have two samples, raw and cut. Cut is a pure subset of raw, all
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Jan Strube wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I'm trying to speed up a piece of code that selects a subsample based on some
> criteria:
> Setup:
> I have two samples, raw and cut. Cut is a pure subset of raw, all elements in
> cut are also in raw, and cut is derived from ra
Dear List,
I'm trying to speed up a piece of code that selects a subsample based on some
criteria:
Setup:
I have two samples, raw and cut. Cut is a pure subset of raw, all elements in
cut are also in raw, and cut is derived from raw by applying some cuts.
Now I would like to select a random subs
