On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Mathew Yeates wrote:
> I should add, I'm starting with N rotation angles. So I should rephrase
> and say I'm starting with N angles and N xy pairs.
>
>
>
> Mathew Yeates wrote:
> > I know this must be trivial but I can't seem to get it right
> >
> > I have N 2x2 a
I should add, I'm starting with N rotation angles. So I should rephrase
and say I'm starting with N angles and N xy pairs.
Mathew Yeates wrote:
> I know this must be trivial but I can't seem to get it right
>
> I have N 2x2 arrays which perform a rotation. I also have N xy pairs to
> transpos
I know this must be trivial but I can't seem to get it right
I have N 2x2 arrays which perform a rotation. I also have N xy pairs to
transpose. What is the simplest way to perform the transformation
without looping?
Thanks from someone about to punch their screen.
__
