>> Again, would a function for the
>> "empirical inverse survival function" qualify for the
>> inclusion into numpy or scipy?
>
> Sorry, I'm too distracted, correcting myself a second time
> "this should *not* have inverse in it, using inverse was a cut and paste
> error"
> it's empirical survi
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Tim
Michelsen wrote:
>> My first stop is usually wikipedia:
> [...]
> Thanks.
> So I I'known that I have to call the beast a
> "empirical inverse survival function", Robert would
> also have foundit easier to help.
> Anyway, step by step...
>
>> In the case of the w
> My first stop is usually wikipedia:
[...]
Thanks.
So I I'known that I have to call the beast a
"empirical inverse survival function", Robert would
also have foundit easier to help.
Anyway, step by step...
> In the case of the weight of pigs, it would be to cumulative weight of
> all pigs with
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Tim
Michelsen wrote:
>>
> Hello,
> I have checked the snippets you proposed.
> It does what I wanted to achieve.
> Obviously, I had to substract the values as Robert
> demonstrated. This could also be perceived from
> the figure I posted.
>
> I still have see how I c
>
Hello,
I have checked the snippets you proposed.
It does what I wanted to achieve.
Obviously, I had to substract the values as Robert
demonstrated. This could also be perceived from
the figure I posted.
I still have see how I can optimise the code
(c.f. below) or modify to be less complicated
> >>> Okay. That is completely different from what you've asked before.
> > You are right.
> > But it's soemtimes hard to decribe a desired and expected output in
> > python terms and pseudocode.
> > I still have to lern more numpy vocabs...
>
> Actually, I apologize. I meant to delete that line b
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 19:11, Tim Michelsen wrote:
> Hello Robert and Josef,
> thanks for the quick answers! I really appreciate this.
>
I am trying to create a inverse cumulative histogram [3] which shall
look like [4] but with the higher values at the left.
>>> Okay. That is completely
Hello Robert and Josef,
thanks for the quick answers! I really appreciate this.
>>> I am trying to create a inverse cumulative histogram [3] which shall
>>> look like [4] but with the higher values at the left.
>> Okay. That is completely different from what you've asked before.
You are right.
But
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 18:15, Tim Michelsen
> wrote:
>> Hello fellow numy users,
>> I posted some questions on histograms recently [1, 2] but still couldn't
>> find a solution.
>>
>> I am trying to create a inverse cumulative histogram [3] whic
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 18:15, Tim Michelsen wrote:
> Hello fellow numy users,
> I posted some questions on histograms recently [1, 2] but still couldn't
> find a solution.
>
> I am trying to create a inverse cumulative histogram [3] which shall
> look like [4] but with the higher values at the lef
Hello fellow numy users,
I posted some questions on histograms recently [1, 2] but still couldn't
find a solution.
I am trying to create a inverse cumulative histogram [3] which shall
look like [4] but with the higher values at the left.
The classification shall follow this exemplary rule:
cl
11 matches
Mail list logo
