A Monday 17 May 2010 20:11:28 Keith Goodman escrigué:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Francesc Alted
wrote:
> > A Sunday 16 May 2010 21:14:34 Davide Lasagna escrigué:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> What is the fastest and lowest memory consumption way to compute this?
> >>
> >> y = np.arange(2**24)
>
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Francesc Alted wrote:
> A Sunday 16 May 2010 21:14:34 Davide Lasagna escrigué:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> What is the fastest and lowest memory consumption way to compute this?
>>
>> y = np.arange(2**24)
>> bases = y[1:] + y[:-1]
>>
>> Actually it is already quite fast, but
A Sunday 16 May 2010 21:14:34 Davide Lasagna escrigué:
> Hi all,
>
> What is the fastest and lowest memory consumption way to compute this?
>
> y = np.arange(2**24)
> bases = y[1:] + y[:-1]
>
> Actually it is already quite fast, but i'm not sure whether it is occupying
> some temporary memory
>
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 05/16/2010 09:24 AM, Keith Goodman wrote:
>> On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Davide Lasagna
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> What is the fastest and lowest memory consumption way to compute this?
>>> y = np.arange(2**24)
>>> bases = y[1:] + y[:
Well, actually np.arange(2**24) was just to test the following line ;). I'm
particularly concerned about memory consumption rather than speed.
On 16 May 2010 22:53, Brent Pedersen wrote:
> On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Davide Lasagna
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > What is the fastest and lowest m
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Davide Lasagna
wrote:
> Hi all,
> What is the fastest and lowest memory consumption way to compute this?
> y = np.arange(2**24)
> bases = y[1:] + y[:-1]
> Actually it is already quite fast, but i'm not sure whether it is occupying
> some temporary memory
> is the
On 05/16/2010 09:24 AM, Keith Goodman wrote:
> On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Davide Lasagna
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> What is the fastest and lowest memory consumption way to compute this?
>> y = np.arange(2**24)
>> bases = y[1:] + y[:-1]
>> Actually it is already quite fast, but i'm not sure wh
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Davide Lasagna
wrote:
> Hi all,
> What is the fastest and lowest memory consumption way to compute this?
> y = np.arange(2**24)
> bases = y[1:] + y[:-1]
> Actually it is already quite fast, but i'm not sure whether it is occupying
> some temporary memory
> is the
Hi all,
What is the fastest and lowest memory consumption way to compute this?
y = np.arange(2**24)
bases = y[1:] + y[:-1]
Actually it is already quite fast, but i'm not sure whether it is occupying
some temporary memory
is the summation. Any help is appreciated.
Cheers
Davide
