Hi,
Thanks
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
>> But I have some questions. It seems to work as is, but I don't set c
> to
>> zeros anywhere. Can I assume arrays created by f2py are zero?
>
> As I understand it, uninitialized variables in Fortran are
> compiler/system-depend
> -Original Message-
> From: numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org [mailto:numpy-discussion-
> boun...@scipy.org] On Behalf Of Robin
> Sent: 15 Oct 2009 6:54 AM
> To: numpy-discussion@scipy.org
> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] extension questions: f2py and cython
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org [mailto:numpy-discussion-
> boun...@scipy.org] On Behalf Of Robin
> Sent: 15 Oct 2009 4:37 AM
> To: numpy-discussion@scipy.org
> Subject: [Numpy-discussion] extension questions: f2py and cython
>
>
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Robin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have another question about distributing a Python extension which
> uses f2py wrapped code. Ideally I'd like to keep pure Python/Numpy
> alternatives and just use fortran version if available - but I think
> that should be OK.
>
> I'm more
Hi,
I have another question about distributing a Python extension which
uses f2py wrapped code. Ideally I'd like to keep pure Python/Numpy
alternatives and just use fortran version if available - but I think
that should be OK.
I'm more worried about distributing binaries on Windows - I think on
M
Hi,
Sent this last week but checking the archives it appears not to have
got through. Hopefully this will work...
I am looking at moving some of my code to fortran to use with f2py. To
get started I used this simple example:
SUBROUTINE bincount (x,c,n,m)
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER, INTENT(I
