On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:39:20 -0500, josef.pktd wrote:
Doc update committed in f527b49a.
>> Why does assert_allclose have atol=0, while np.allclose has rtol=1.e-5,
>> atol=1.e-8 ?
>
> Probably no reason, it should be fixed.
I'm guessing that w
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Mon, 07 Mar 2011 08:30:11 -0500, josef.pktd wrote:
> [clip]
>> assert_approx_equal checks for signigicant digits in decimal system,
>> which looks like it's easy to interpret.
>
> Ditto for tolerance=1e-7, which has the advantage that it's w
Mon, 07 Mar 2011 08:30:11 -0500, josef.pktd wrote:
[clip]
> assert_approx_equal checks for signigicant digits in decimal system,
> which looks like it's easy to interpret.
Ditto for tolerance=1e-7, which has the advantage that it's what
"print abs(desired-actual)" prints.
> I don't have much ide
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:39:20 -0500, josef.pktd wrote:
> [clip]
>> Why does assert_allclose have atol=0, while np.allclose has rtol=1.e-5,
>> atol=1.e-8 ?
>
> Probably no reason, it should be fixed.
>
>> What's the status on np.testing.assert_app
Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:39:20 -0500, josef.pktd wrote:
[clip]
> Why does assert_allclose have atol=0, while np.allclose has rtol=1.e-5,
> atol=1.e-8 ?
Probably no reason, it should be fixed.
> What's the status on np.testing.assert_approx_equal, I would have liked
> to use it more often, except it do
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:03:17 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> [clip]
>> If anyone has new deprecations they want to put in for 1.6, discussing
>> them now would be good. I found one item in Trac, #1543. The proposal in
>> the ticket is to deprecate
Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:03:17 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote:
[clip]
> If anyone has new deprecations they want to put in for 1.6, discussing
> them now would be good. I found one item in Trac, #1543. The proposal in
> the ticket is to deprecate assert_almost_equal because it is quite badly
> behaved. This
Hi,
I went through the current deprecations, and removed a number of
things that have been deprecated for a long time, see
https://github.com/rgommers/numpy/commits/deprecations-1.6. I'll
commit that unless anyone objects.
If anyone has new deprecations they want to put in for 1.6, discussing
the
