Re: [Numpy-discussion] datetime64 y2k38 bug

2011-09-30 Thread Mark Wiebe
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 8:52 PM, wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Charles R Harris > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > >>> > >>> I was working on adding some test case

Re: [Numpy-discussion] datetime64 y2k38 bug

2011-09-18 Thread josef . pktd
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: >>> >>> I was working on adding some test cases in numpy for the argmin/max >>> functions with some datetime64

Re: [Numpy-discussion] datetime64 y2k38 bug

2011-09-18 Thread Benjamin Root
On Sunday, September 18, 2011, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: >> >> I was working on adding some test cases in numpy for the argmin/max functions with some datetime64s. I found that on my 32-bit machine, it fails to parse a date past the Y2.03

Re: [Numpy-discussion] datetime64 y2k38 bug

2011-09-18 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > >> I was working on adding some test cases in numpy for the argmin/max >> functions with some datetime64s. I found that on my 32-bit machine, it >> fails to parse a date past t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] datetime64 y2k38 bug

2011-09-18 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > I was working on adding some test cases in numpy for the argmin/max > functions with some datetime64s. I found that on my 32-bit machine, it > fails to parse a date past the Y2.038k date. I find this odd because the > datetime is supposed

[Numpy-discussion] datetime64 y2k38 bug

2011-09-18 Thread Benjamin Root
I was working on adding some test cases in numpy for the argmin/max functions with some datetime64s. I found that on my 32-bit machine, it fails to parse a date past the Y2.038k date. I find this odd because the datetime is supposed to be 64-bits, but I guess there is some arch-dependent code som