On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Ralf Gommers <
> ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Maybe I'm misunderstanding this, and once you make a function work for
>> datetime it would also work for other new dtypes. But my impression is that
On Jun 11, 2011, at 12:57 AM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> The other issue is how do you define the np.arange step argument since that
> can be in different scales such as month, years, seconds? Can a user specific
> days and get half-days (like 1.5 days) or must these be 'integer' days?
>
> The dateti
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Bruce Southey wrote:
> **
>
>
> I have following the multiple date/time discussions with some interest as
> it is clear there is not 'one way' (perhaps it's Dutch). But, I do keep
> coming back to Chris's concepts of time as a strict unit of measure and time
>
On 06/10/2011 09:18 AM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Ralf Gommers
mailto:ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com>> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Mark Wiebe mailto:mwwi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Ralf Gommers
mailto:ralf.gomm
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Ralf Gommers > > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Ralf Gommers <
>>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Ralf Gommers <
>>> ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Jun 9
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Ralf Gommers > > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Christopher Barker
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 16:27, Robert Kern wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 15:01, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> >> I've replaced the previous two pull requests with a single pull request
> >> rolling up all the changes so far. The newest changes inclu
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 16:27, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 15:01, Mark Wiebe wrote:
>> I've replaced the previous two pull requests with a single pull request
>> rolling up all the changes so far. The newest changes include finishing the
>> generic unit and np.arange function suppo
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Christopher Barker <
>>> chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>> Your branch works fine f
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 15:01, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> > I've replaced the previous two pull requests with a single pull request
> > rolling up all the changes so far. The newest changes include finishing
> the
> > generic unit and np.arange functi
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Christopher Barker > > wrote:
>>
>> Your branch works fine for me (OS X, py2.6), no failures. Only a few
> deprecation warnings like:
> /Library/Framew
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 15:01, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> I've replaced the previous two pull requests with a single pull request
> rolling up all the changes so far. The newest changes include finishing the
> generic unit and np.arange function support.
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/87
> Because
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Christopher Barker
> wrote:
>
> Your branch works fine for me (OS X, py2.6), no failures. Only a few
deprecation warnings like:
/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/python2.6/unittest.py:336:
D
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Christopher Barker
wrote:
> Mark Wiebe wrote:
> > Because of the nature of datetime and timedelta, arange has to be
> > slightly different than with all the other types. In particular, for
> > datetime the primary signature is np.arange(datetime, datetime,
> timed
Mark Wiebe wrote:
> Because of the nature of datetime and timedelta, arange has to be
> slightly different than with all the other types. In particular, for
> datetime the primary signature is np.arange(datetime, datetime, timedelta).
>
> I've implemented a simple extension which allows for anot
I've replaced the previous two pull requests with a single pull request
rolling up all the changes so far. The newest changes include finishing the
generic unit and np.arange function support.
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/87
Because of the nature of datetime and timedelta, arange has to be
17 matches
Mail list logo
