David Cournapeau wrote:
> If you install blas/lapack from sage, it kind of defeats the whole
> purpose of garnumpy. The goal is to have a unified set of options to
> build. It is likely that sage uses different options than the ones from
> garnumpy. If you use garnumpy, you should use it for everyt
Francis wrote:
> Thank you for your effort. I guess garnumpy reflects the idea in this
> Pylab discussion: http://www.scipy.org/PyLab
>
> Again I get errors in libblas/lapack related to gfortran (local
> variable problems). I replaced the libblas.a and the liblaplack.a by
> the ones of sage. And st
Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 06:26, Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thank you for your effort. I guess garnumpy reflects the idea in this
>> Pylab discussion: http://www.scipy.org/PyLab
>>
>> Again I get errors in libblas/lapack related to gfortran (local
>> variable problems)
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 06:26, Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you for your effort. I guess garnumpy reflects the idea in this
> Pylab discussion: http://www.scipy.org/PyLab
>
> Again I get errors in libblas/lapack related to gfortran (local
> variable problems). I replaced the libblas.a
Thank you for your effort. I guess garnumpy reflects the idea in this
Pylab discussion: http://www.scipy.org/PyLab
Again I get errors in libblas/lapack related to gfortran (local
variable problems). I replaced the libblas.a and the liblaplack.a by
the ones of sage. And started make install again.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In general the IT dep. don't want changes since changes require weeks
> of testing to make sure that existing applications are not
> conflicting, etc. I am not sure they would fulfill my request.
> Especially since it has no prio
Francis wrote:
> In general the IT dep. don't want changes since changes require weeks
> of testing to make sure that existing applications are not
> conflicting, etc.
I feel your pain.
In such case, I ask if it is possible to ask for vmware installation:
nowadays, cpu are fast enough such as ru
In general the IT dep. don't want changes since changes require weeks
of testing to make sure that existing applications are not
conflicting, etc. I am not sure they would fulfill my request.
Especially since it has no priority at all.
I am installing Sage math now. Although I would like to avoid
Francis wrote:
>
> I can't open rpm files so I opened numpy with archive manager and
> extracted Numpy to site-packages.
Can't you ask your admin to install rpm packages ? Uncompressing the rpm
and putting them into random places is unlikely to work.
> Unfortunately importing numpy
> results in
On Sep 17, 2:37 am, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Francis wrote:
>
> > To be frank, I am bit of noob, but not completely. I use the gfortran
> > make.inc to build lapack. The make.inc file to build and install atlas
> > is using gfortran. I used the --fcompiler=gfortran flag. I don
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:38 AM, David Cournapeau
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Cournapeau wrote:
>>
>> I am really sorry for all this trouble. The last solution you could try,
>> with a bit old packages is my own repository, with Centos packages:
>>
>> http://download.opensuse.org/repositori
David Cournapeau wrote:
>
> I am really sorry for all this trouble. The last solution you could try,
> with a bit old packages is my own repository, with Centos packages:
>
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/ashigabou/CentOS_5/
I could update numpy to a recent one (1.1.1), but unfort
Francis wrote:
>
> To be frank, I am bit of noob, but not completely. I use the gfortran
> make.inc to build lapack. The make.inc file to build and install atlas
> is using gfortran. I used the --fcompiler=gfortran flag. I don't
> think there is much else I can do.
Yes there is :) You should use
On 16 Sep, 16:13, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Francis wrote:
> > You are right. I have recompiled everything with gfortran, but now I
> > get the following error when I try to import numpy: undefined symbol:
> > _gfortran_concat_string.
>
> This means something at some point was n
Hi,
On Sep 16, 2008, at 11:13 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> Yes, I think they package everything by themselves. I am starting to
> think that we should do the same for blas/lapack, that's also how R
> does
> it by default, and I am so tired of seeing the same errors coming
> again
> and again
Francis wrote:
> You are right. I have recompiled everything with gfortran, but now I
> get the following error when I try to import numpy: undefined symbol:
> _gfortran_concat_string.
This means something at some point was not built with gfortran, or that
you did not use gfortran to build numpy.
You are right. I have recompiled everything with gfortran, but now I
get the following error when I try to import numpy: undefined symbol:
_gfortran_concat_string.
I have build a while ago sage-math (where everything is build
locally), but I delete it since it was over 1GB and I am only
interested
Francis wrote:
>
>
> ATLAS version 3.8.2 built by francisd on Mon Sep 15 15:20:08 BST 2008:
>UNAME: Linux red-67 2.6.18-92.el5 #1 SMP Tue Jun 10 18:51:06
> EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>INSTFLG : -1 0 -a 1
>ARCHDEFS : -DATL_OS_Linux -DATL_ARCH_PIII -DATL_CPUMHZ=2500 -
>
On 16 Sep, 10:18, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Francis wrote:
>
> > I don't really need Python2.5. Python2.4 is actually available on the
> > network but I think I will run into problems using the network one and
> > try using local libraries.
>
> No, it is perfectly supported (I d
Francis wrote:
>
> I don't really need Python2.5. Python2.4 is actually available on the
> network but I think I will run into problems using the network one and
> try using local libraries.
No, it is perfectly supported (I do it all the time, even on my own
machines where I have root rights). You
> Do you really need python 2.5 ? By building your own python, you are
> forcing yourself to build every package you will need for python,
> including the dependencies. For matplotlib, it will be painful. Python
> 2.4 is enough (incidentally, I have to use Centos 5 at some place, on
> the same arch
Francis Drossaert wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am trying to install python2.5/scipy/numpy/sympy/matplotlib locally,
> because of various reasons. I am not root.
Do you really need python 2.5 ? By building your own python, you are
forcing yourself to build every package you will need for python,
in
Hi everybody,
I am trying to install python2.5/scipy/numpy/sympy/matplotlib locally,
because of various reasons. I am not root.
At home I am using Ubuntu and I am root and everything works as it should.
So far I managed to make python2.5, sympy and ipython to run fine on
my computer at work, but
23 matches
Mail list logo
