Re: [Numpy-discussion] broadcasting for randint

2016-06-16 Thread G Young
Hello all, Thank you to those who commented on this PR and for pushing it to a *much better place* in terms of templating with Tempita. With that issue out of the way it seems, the momentum has stalled a bit. However, it would be great to receive any additional feedback, *especially from maintai

Re: [Numpy-discussion] broadcasting for randint

2016-06-07 Thread G Young
There seems to be a push in my PR now for using Tempita as a way to solve this issue with the ad-hoc templating. However, before I go about attempting this, it would be great to receive feedback from other developers on this, especially from some of the numpy maintainers. Thanks! On Tue, Jun 7,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] broadcasting for randint

2016-06-06 Thread G Young
Just wanted to ping the mailing list again in case this email (see below) got lost in your inboxes. Would be great to get some feedback on this! Thanks! On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 2:15 AM, G Young wrote: > Hi, > > I have had a PR open for quite > some tim

Re: [Numpy-discussion] broadcasting for randint

2016-05-21 Thread G Young
Hi, I have had a PR open for quite some time now that allows arguments to broadcast in *randint*. While the functionality is fully in-place and very robust, the obstacle at this point is the implementation. When the *dtype* parameter was added to *randi