On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:08, Skipper Seabold wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Mark Miller
wrote:
> Not quite. Bincount is fine if you have a set of approximately
>>
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:08, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Mark Miller
>>> wrote:
Not quite. Bincount is fine if you have a set of approximately
sequential numbers. But if you don't
>>
>>
>> On 6/
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Mark Miller
>> wrote:
>>> Not quite. Bincount is fine if you have a set of approximately
>>> sequential numbers. But if you don't
>
>
> On 6/1/2011 9:35 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> Even worse, it fails
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>> Not quite. Bincount is fine if you have a set of approximately
>> sequential numbers. But if you don't
On 6/1/2011 9:35 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> Even worse, it fails miserably if you sequential numbers but with a high
> shift.
> n