(we hashed this out on IRC, but replying here for the sake of
recording it)
On 5-Dec-09, at 9:04 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Can you try to change linalg/setup.py so that it *only* includes
> lapack_litemodule.c in the build?
Yup; it turns out it wasn't NumPy's lapack_lite calling dlamc3_ but
la, 2009-12-05 kello 20:27 -0500, David Warde-Farley kirjoitti:
[clip]
> I've briefly been trying to figure out how to work around this, but
> I'm a bit confused. I was under the (mistaken?) impression that the
> f2c'd code in dlapack_lite.c, zlapack_lite.c and dlamch.c was only
> used in the
On 29-Nov-09, at 4:46 PM, David Warde-Farley wrote:
> On 27-Nov-09, at 6:29 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>> 3.9.12 segfaulted on me while running, so I haven't bothered with
>> versions after that. Why not try the stable version 3.8.3?
>
> Just to follow up, I went back to 3.9.11 and numpy works
On 27-Nov-09, at 6:29 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> 3.9.12 segfaulted on me while running, so I haven't bothered with
> versions after that. Why not try the stable version 3.8.3?
Just to follow up, I went back to 3.9.11 and numpy works without
incident, using the exact same ATLAS build proced
On 27-Nov-09, at 7:49 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> I guess because of the updated threading support.
Right you are; the 3.9 series is rather faster I find, at least in
parallel.
> I think the solution is to simply bypass the atlas mechanism to build
> lapack, and do it manually.
Tried that.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Warde-Farley
> wrote:
>>
>> On 27-Nov-09, at 5:02 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>>
>> > What version of ATLAS?
>>
>> 3.9.17, the latest development branch version. At some point in the
>
> 3.9.12 s
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Warde-Farley wrote:
> On 27-Nov-09, at 5:02 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
> > What version of ATLAS?
>
> 3.9.17, the latest development branch version. At some point in the
3.9.12 segfaulted on me while running, so I haven't bothered with versions
after tha
On 27-Nov-09, at 5:02 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> What version of ATLAS?
3.9.17, the latest development branch version. At some point in the
changelog the author mentions he removed other methods building with
LAPACK, leaving only the tarfile one. I'm giving the entire build
another try w
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:04 PM, David Warde-Farley wrote:
> On 26-Nov-09, at 8:56 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
> > I never had luck with the netlib-lapack-tarfile=
> > option, it didn't build lapack correctly. Try doing them separately.
>
> I just tried that.
>
> -Ss flapack path/to/lapack_LINUX
On 26-Nov-09, at 8:56 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> I never had luck with the netlib-lapack-tarfile=
> option, it didn't build lapack correctly. Try doing them separately.
I just tried that.
-Ss flapack path/to/lapack_LINUX.a didn't seem to build a proper
LAPACK (it was missing all sorts of st
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 6:53 PM, David Warde-Farley wrote:
> It seems like I've done this enough times on enough machines but I'm
> still running into problems...
>
> After installing what I'm pretty sure is a complete ATLAS+LAPACK and
> building numpy against it (appropriately editing site.cfg, e
It seems like I've done this enough times on enough machines but I'm
still running into problems...
After installing what I'm pretty sure is a complete ATLAS+LAPACK and
building numpy against it (appropriately editing site.cfg, etc.) I'm
faced with this when building numpy-1.3.0:
d...@mirag
12 matches
Mail list logo
