Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-18 Thread Pauli Virtanen
12.04.2012 18:43, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti: [clip] > My current list of preferences is: > > 1. Redmine (if admin overhead is not unreasonable) > 2. Trac with performance issues solved > 3. Github > 4. YouTrack > 5. Trac with current performance Redmine seems pretty nice, apparently has all the feat

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-12 Thread Maggie Mari
On 4/12/12 11:43 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: Thanks, that's a clear description of pros and cons. It's also easy to play with Redmine at demo.redmine.org . That site allows you to set up a new project and try the admin interface. My current list of preferences is: 1. R

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-12 Thread David Cournapeau
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:29 PM, william ratcliff < william.ratcl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Has anyone tried Rietveld, Gerrit, or Phabricator? rietveld and gerrit are code review tools. I have not heard of phabricator, but this article certainly makes it sounds interesting: http://www.readwriteweb.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-12 Thread william ratcliff
Has anyone tried Rietveld, Gerrit, or Phabricator? On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > This looks good. Maggie and Bryan are now setting up a Redmine instance > to try out how hard that is to administer.I have some experience with > Redmine and have liked what I've s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-12 Thread Travis Oliphant
This looks good. Maggie and Bryan are now setting up a Redmine instance to try out how hard that is to administer.I have some experience with Redmine and have liked what I've seen in the past. I think the user experience that Ralf is providing feedback on is much more important than how h

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-12 Thread David Cournapeau
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:53 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Ralf Gommers < >> ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Bryan Van de Ven >>> wrote: >>> >>>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-12 Thread Hans-Martin v. Gaudecker
On 12.04.2012, at 18:38, numpy-discussion-requ...@scipy.org wrote: >>> Redmine does look good from a quick browse (better view, does display >>> diffs). It would be good to get the opinions of a few more people on this >>> topic. >>> >> >> Redmine is "trac on RoR", but it solves two significant

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-12 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:53 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Bryan Van de Ven wrote: >> >>> On 4/3/12 4:18 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >>> > Here some first impressions. >>> > >>> > The good: >>> > -

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-12 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Andreas H. wrote: > Have you guys actually thought about JIRA? Atlassian offers free licences > for open source projects ... > Yes, http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/48224/match=jira Ralf ___ N

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-12 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Bryan Van de Ven wrote: > On 4/10/12 2:40 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Bryan Van de Ven wrote: > >> On 4/3/12 4:18 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> > Here some first impressions. >> > >> > The good: >> > - It's responsive! >> > - It

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-12 Thread Andreas H.
Have you guys actually thought about JIRA? Atlassian offers free licences for open source projects ... Cheers, Andreas. ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-12 Thread Bryan Van de Ven
On 4/10/12 2:40 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Bryan Van de Ven > wrote: On 4/3/12 4:18 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Here some first impressions. > > The good: > - It's responsive! > - It remembers my preferences (view

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-10 Thread David Cournapeau
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Bryan Van de Ven wrote: > >> On 4/3/12 4:18 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> > Here some first impressions. >> > >> > The good: >> > - It's responsive! >> > - It remembers my preferences (view type, # of issues p

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-10 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Bryan Van de Ven wrote: > On 4/3/12 4:18 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > Here some first impressions. > > > > The good: > > - It's responsive! > > - It remembers my preferences (view type, # of issues per page, etc.) > > - Editing multiple issues with the command windo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-09 Thread Bryan Van de Ven
On 4/3/12 4:18 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Here some first impressions. > > The good: > - It's responsive! > - It remembers my preferences (view type, # of issues per page, etc.) > - Editing multiple issues with the command window is easy. > - Search and filter functionality is powerful > > The bad:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-04 Thread Bryan Van de Ven
On 4/3/12 4:18 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > The bad: > - Multiple projects are supported, but issues are then really mixed. > The way this works doesn't look very useful for combined admin of > numpy/scipy trackers. > - I haven't found a way yet to make versions and subsystems appear in > the one-l

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-03 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Maggie Mari wrote: > On 4/1/12 6:02 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > The interface looks good, but to get a feeling for how this would > > really work out I think admin rights are necessary. Then we can try > > out the command window (mass editing of issues), the rest AP

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-03 Thread Maggie Mari
On 4/1/12 6:02 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > The interface looks good, but to get a feeling for how this would > really work out I think admin rights are necessary. Then we can try > out the command window (mass editing of issues), the rest API, etc. > Could you send those out off-list? Hi Ralf, I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-01 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > > The idea is to allow people to test-out YouTrack for a few weeks and get > to know it while we migrate bugs to it. it looks like it is > straightforward to export the data out of YouTrack should we eventually > decide to use something e

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-03-31 Thread Travis Oliphant
The idea is to allow people to test-out YouTrack for a few weeks and get to know it while we migrate bugs to it. it looks like it is straightforward to export the data out of YouTrack should we eventually decide to use something else. The idea is to host it on an external server (Rackspace

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-03-30 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Maggie Mari wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > I work with Travis at Continuum, and he asked me to setup a YouTrack > server that everyone is welcome to play around with. There is a test > project currently set up, with some fake tickets. > > Here is the address: > >

[Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-03-30 Thread Maggie Mari
Hello, everyone. I work with Travis at Continuum, and he asked me to setup a YouTrack server that everyone is welcome to play around with. There is a test project currently set up, with some fake tickets. Here is the address: http://ec2-107-21-65-210.compute-1.amazonaws.com:8011/issues