Thanks, that works. It will be nice when the original way works also.
On Oct 16, 2013 10:28 AM, "Sebastian Berg"
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 11:50 -0400, Benjamin Root wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chad Kidder
> > wrote:
> > Just found what should be a bug
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 11:50 -0400, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chad Kidder
> wrote:
> Just found what should be a bug in 1.7.1. I'm running
> python(x,y) on windows here:
>
> >>> dataMatrix[ii,:,mask].shape
> (201, 23)
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chad Kidder wrote:
> Just found what should be a bug in 1.7.1. I'm running python(x,y) on
> windows here:
>
> >>> dataMatrix[ii,:,mask].shape
> (201, 23)
> >>> dataMatrix[ii,:,:].shape
> (23, 201)
> >>> dataMatrix.shape
> (24, 23, 201)
> >>> mask
> array([ True,
Just found what should be a bug in 1.7.1. I'm running python(x,y) on
windows here:
>>> dataMatrix[ii,:,mask].shape
(201, 23)
>>> dataMatrix[ii,:,:].shape
(23, 201)
>>> dataMatrix.shape
(24, 23, 201)
>>> mask
array([ True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True,
...