David Huard wrote:
> I don't know how far we can disgress from the reST syntax using
> those plugins, but it's probably something worth looking at.
Digression => maintenance burden.
Cheers,
Alan Isaac
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussi
To get back to the original subject of the thread, there has been a commit
today on the docutils plugins branch that allows folks to write their own
parser/writer and somehow include it in docutils, without having to rebuild
docutils. In other words, NumPy could define a plugin, and if docutils is
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 06:44:37PM +0200, Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
> "Barry Wark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Yes, I agree. I wasn't coming at so much from the goal of making Pylab
> > a Matlab clone (as you point out, that's silly, and misses much of the
> > advantage of Python), but rather
Hi,
On 2/25/07, Jouni K. Seppänen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose these things could be addressed quite neatly by IPython.
> It could even modify your history similarly to what it currently
> does with the %magic commands, so that when you type
Feel free to play with implementing this, it
"Barry Wark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I agree. I wasn't coming at so much from the goal of making Pylab
> a Matlab clone (as you point out, that's silly, and misses much of the
> advantage of Python), but rather from the goal of making interactive
> use as efficient as possible. When I f
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Keir Mierle apparently wrote:
> * Two different header styles
>The distinction between
>:Parameters:
>and
>Examples
>
These are not two items of the same type.
``:Parameters:`` designates a consolidated field (for
describing the documented object)
On 2/15/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/15/07, Keir Mierle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On the DocstringStandard page I have also put a completely re-done docstring
> > for the 'contour' function from matplotlib. I think it is far more readable
> > than the original [3]. JDH and
On 2/15/07, Keir Mierle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the DocstringStandard page I have also put a completely re-done docstring
> for the 'contour' function from matplotlib. I think it is far more readable
> than the original [3]. JDH and other matplotlibheads, what do you think?
> Travis, do you
I'd like to help the docstring formats of numpy, scipy. and matplotlib converge
on a high-quality standard (hence the cross-posting). However, before that can
happen all maintainers from all three packages need to agree on a format. In
the interest of speeding things along, I've taken the liberty o
