Re: [Numpy-discussion] Threading question for Travis

Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Travis E. Oliphant > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Charles R Harris wrote: > > Travis, > > > > Is this correct? > > > Yes. > > NPY_LOOP_BEGIN_THREADS; > > switch(loop

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Threading question for Travis

On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Charles R Harris wrote: > > Travis, > > > > Is this correct? > > > Yes. > > NPY_LOOP_BEGIN_THREADS; > > switch(loop->meth) { > > case ONE_UFUNCLOOP: > > /* > > * Everything is contiguous,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Threading question for Travis

Charles R Harris wrote: > Travis, > > Is this correct? > Yes. > NPY_LOOP_BEGIN_THREADS; > switch(loop->meth) { > case ONE_UFUNCLOOP: > /* > * Everything is contiguous, notswapped, aligned, > * and of the right type. -- Fastest. > * Or if not contiguou

[Numpy-discussion] Threading question for Travis

Travis, Is this correct? NPY_LOOP_BEGIN_THREADS; switch(loop->meth) { case ONE_UFUNCLOOP: /* * Everything is contiguous, notswapped, aligned, * and of the right type. -- Fastest. * Or if not contiguous, then a single-stride * increment move