Hi Julian,
to distinguish between mingw32 and mingw-w64 we need something like this:
#include
if !defined(HAVE_EXPM1) || defined(__MINGW64_VERSION_MAJOR)
instead of
if !defined(HAVE_EXPM1) || defined(__MINGW32__)
the latter is true for both: mingw32 and mingw-w64. I guess the mingw32
implemen
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> On 23.04.2014 21:25, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Julian Taylor
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Matthew Brett
>>> wrote:
It looks as though mingw-w64 is at fault, and I w
On 23.04.2014 21:25, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Julian Taylor
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It looks as though mingw-w64 is at fault, and I was confused (still
>>> am) because of the different behavior with dou
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> It looks as though mingw-w64 is at fault, and I was confused (still
>> am) because of the different behavior with double and a constant:
>>
>> #include
>> #include
>>
>>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>
> It looks as though mingw-w64 is at fault, and I was confused (still
> am) because of the different behavior with double and a constant:
>
> #include
> #include
>
> int main() {
> double z, i = -0.0;
> printf("With double %f=%f, wi
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Charles R Harris
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Brett
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Brett
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Julian Taylor
> >> wrote:
> >> > The offi
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Julian Taylor
>> wrote:
>> > The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
>> > Only the VC builds
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Julian Taylor <
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
> Only the VC builds do.
> As mingw is fine the functions must be somewhere in the windows API but
> no-one has contributed a fix for the V
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Julian Taylor
> wrote:
> > The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
> > Only the VC builds do.
> > As mingw is fine the functions must be somewhere in the windows API but
>
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
> Only the VC builds do.
> As mingw is fine the functions must be somewhere in the windows API but
> no-one has contributed a fix for the VC builds to numpy yet.
I'm b
The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
Only the VC builds do.
As mingw is fine the functions must be somewhere in the windows API but
no-one has contributed a fix for the VC builds to numpy yet.
On 14.04.2014 22:43, Carl Kleffner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> mingw has expm1. Is
Hi,
mingw has expm1. Is this function suitable?
Regards
Carl
2014-04-14 21:34 GMT+02:00 Eric Moore :
>
>
> On Monday, April 14, 2014, Matthew Brett wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Warren Weckesser
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Matthew Brett >
On Monday, April 14, 2014, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Warren Weckesser
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Matthew Brett
> >
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> With Carl Kleffner, I am trying to build a numpy 1.8.1 wheel for
> >> Windows
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Warren Weckesser
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> With Carl Kleffner, I am trying to build a numpy 1.8.1 wheel for
>> Windows 64-bit, and latest stable ATLAS.
>>
>> It works fine, apart from the following tes
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With Carl Kleffner, I am trying to build a numpy 1.8.1 wheel for
> Windows 64-bit, and latest stable ATLAS.
>
> It works fine, apart from the following test failure:
>
>
Hi,
With Carl Kleffner, I am trying to build a numpy 1.8.1 wheel for
Windows 64-bit, and latest stable ATLAS.
It works fine, apart from the following test failure:
==
FAIL: test_special (test_umath.TestExpm1)
---
18 matches
Mail list logo
