Hey Alan,
Please go ahead and commit your changes to use nose as our testing
framework. We have all ready decided to go with nose. SciPy has all
ready been converted. I don't think anyone raised any concerns that
we should use another testing framework at this point. Once we switch
over to usi
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:21:11 +0200
Gael Varoquaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 02:51:51AM +0200, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
> > > Build instructions don't really belong in docstrings. Put it in the
> > > README.txt or DEV_README.txt.
>
> > No, but running the tests is some
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 02:51:51AM +0200, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
> > Build instructions don't really belong in docstrings. Put it in the
> > README.txt or DEV_README.txt.
> No, but running the tests is something every user should do before
> using NumPy. Unless you object, I'll add that bit t
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 19:51, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/12 Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 04:57, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 2008/6/10 Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is the stuff Robert pointed out on a wiki
2008/6/12 Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 04:57, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2008/6/10 Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Is the stuff Robert pointed out on a wiki page somewhere? It would be
>>> nice to have a "Welcome noob NumPy developer, here
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 04:57, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2008/6/10 Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Is the stuff Robert pointed out on a wiki page somewhere? It would be
>>> nice to have a "Welco
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 04:57, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/10 Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Is the stuff Robert pointed out on a wiki page somewhere? It would be
>> nice to have a "Welcome noob NumPy developer, here's how to do
>> NumPy-specific development thing
Could this also be added as a comment in the module docstring for
test modules? It seems that anyone hacking on test code would be most
likely to see it there...?
Barry
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/10 Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2008/6/10 Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is the stuff Robert pointed out on a wiki page somewhere? It would be
> nice to have a "Welcome noob NumPy developer, here's how to do
> NumPy-specific development things," page. There may be such a page,
> but I just haven't stumbled across it yet.
W
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Anne Archibald
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/8 Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> You can run the test scripts from the source tree without installing
>> them by using nosetests, like this:
>
> I am not enthusiastic about this change: it makes it harder for
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 18:07, Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then again, it doesn't usually work for me to use the boilerplate to
> run a single test without installing, since the non-installed test
> doesn't necessarily find all the non-installed code, sometimes falling
> back on the
2008/6/8 Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Nathan Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Right now there's "if __name__ == '__main__'" boilerplate at the end
>>> of every test module; nose ca
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Matthew Brett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sure you know this already, but you can just replace the tests
> using ParametricTestCase with a nose test generator.
Thanks for pointing that out; it's a rather cool feature. :)
__
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Andrew Straw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using it in some of my code, but I'll happily switch to nose. It
> will make my life easier, however, if I can see how you've converted it.
> If you do this, can you indicate what svn revision made the switch?
Certainly
Hi,
I am sure you know this already, but you can just replace the tests
using ParametricTestCase with a nose test generator. See:
http://www.scipy.org/scipy/scipy/wiki/TestingGuidelines
under Parametric tests.
Best,
Matthew
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Alan McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I suggest we also remove ParametricTestCase now.
>>
>
> I don't mind converting the existing uses (looks like it's only used 5
> times) to something else, it was causing trouble for me
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suggest we also remove ParametricTestCase now.
I don't mind converting the existing uses (looks like it's only used 5
times) to something else, it was causing trouble for me with nose
anyway--whenever the test modul
2008/6/8 Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Right now there's "if __name__ == '__main__'" boilerplate at the end
> of every test module; nose can find and run tests without that being
> there. I wanted to get the list's take on removing that--it just
> means that if you want to run the tests in
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Nathan Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Right now there's "if __name__ == '__main__'" boilerplate at the end
>> of every test module; nose can find and run tests without that being
>> there.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right now there's "if __name__ == '__main__'" boilerplate at the end
> of every test module; nose can find and run tests without that being
> there. I wanted to get the list's take on removing that--it just
> means that if
Hi all,
Later this week (after finals are done ;) I'll be checking in some
changes to switch NumPy tests over to nose, and I just wanted to give
the list a heads up and see if there's any concerns, etc.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * is there a way to se
21 matches
Mail list logo
