On Friday 19 September 2008 04:13:39 Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
> +1 and another +1 to your karma for requesting peer review. Let me
> know if you need me to whip up a couple of tests for verifying the
> different usage cases.
That'd be lovely. I'm a bit swamped with tricky issues in mrecords an
2008/9/19 Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> #---
>> def view(self, dtype=None, type=None):
>> if dtype is None:
>> return ndarray.view(self, type)
>> elif type is None:
>> try:
>> if issubclass(dtype, ndarray):
>>
Pierre GM wrote:
> All,
> I'd like to submit the following suggestion for recarray.view, so that it
> could accept two keywords like standard ndarrays do.
> As a change in records.py can potentially affect a lot of people (probably
> more than a change in numpy.ma), I'm not confident enough to c
All,
I'd like to submit the following suggestion for recarray.view, so that it
could accept two keywords like standard ndarrays do.
As a change in records.py can potentially affect a lot of people (probably
more than a change in numpy.ma), I'm not confident enough to commit it.
Consider that as
